Results 1301 – 1320 of 1868.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| (...) About 2 years ago, we (HMCS Algonquin) were tied up down where the old ferry (Klakala ?) is (I forget what pier it is now), and we were warned not to go into some areas of Seattle at night. I didn't find it that bad, but perhaps the warning (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
half
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) It's clear? Did he mean Marshal Law the comic? Martial law? I'm so confused... ;-) (...) I think Dave!'s scenario implies a longer term than "a few days", otherwise there isn't a lot of point to the question. Basically John is restating the (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) Ummm, I take it that you aren't going to answer the question... Let's see: you basically blamed Kerry for any attack (and ignored that Americans traditionally rally around the incumbent if attacked, which means any attack is actually an aid to (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) I keep looking for something like marshal/marshall/martial....oh wait, there should be a comma after "valid". You sneaky devil - I almost missed it! Do I win a cookie? (Flakey Flix, fudge, no substituting Jack Stone macrofigs) Oooo...ooops, (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) I'm confused. It seems that John's answer was very clear from the snipped quotes above. 1. "A delay for logistical reasons would be valid." Expanding on John's point, I would suggest that something such as Dave's hypothetical about a power (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) Actually, I understood you better than you did, I think. :-) (...) But you wanted to plant the notion that such an attack would be to aid Kerry, regardless of what Kerry would want. It was just the spin you had to put on it when it really (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| | Re: Not Saving Private Ryan.
|
| (...) I think it's fair to say that Europe ignored our advice at the end of WWI, so I'm not sure where the U.S. should accumulate any blame: "We told ya so!" :-) (...) The campaign in Italy wasn't working - the man who came up with the WWI Gallipoli (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.134)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) That really depends on the animal - the smarter they are the more they can move away from "instinct". My bird can put words, individuals, and activities together without me attempting to teach him in the slightest. The dog can do the same, if (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.134)
|
|
| | Re: Xenophobia
|
| (...) My son is already not Aryan Pure, so it matters not to me. The school he goes to is heavily Chinese and Korean, anyway, so I figure if he learned those languages along with Spanish it would just make him that more adaptable. -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.134)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) For the most part, yes, but at the same time, less so than we thought. For a very few species, I start to suspect that David Brin is right about "uplift" being just around the corner. I'm kind of amazed that scientists have dragged their heels (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.134)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) Yup, that's always been a good one. :-) But as if on cue to back me up: (URL) "Research Finds Dogs Understand Language" I didn't need research to have figured this out. My dog brings the right toy when I ask for it (tug-of-war, squeeky, ball), (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.134)
|
|
| |
|
half
(score: 1.134)
|
|
| | Literal Creationism--a non sequitur!
|
| (...) to himself or others. Perhaps an intervention is in order. However, at the bottom of the page Dr. D does make an interesting and absolute refutation of literal readings of the Bible when he indicates: GODISNOWHERE There are two obvious (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 1.133)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.133)
|
|
| |
|
half
(score: 1.133)
|
|
| | Re: Probability: (Was: Re: Chaotic Systems...)
|
| (...) Yea, one place it was a big deal in was Ask Marylyn (sp?) in Parade. There's several ways to analyze it and get to the 2/3 chance. The one I realized yesterday is the simplest (but perhaps not most intuitive) is to realize that by switching, (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 1.133)
|
|
| | Re: Gay Marriage
|
| (...) Merriam-Webster: marriage: (2) the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage Foul ball (counts as Strike one). You are using the term "marriage" to mean "traditional marriage", (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.133)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
