|
 | | Bringing it back to what started it all...
|
| Turns out that Mr. Arar was a *Canadian* citizen who was born in Syria. (URL) Arar is a computer engineer and Canadian citizen who was abducted by the U.S. Government in 2002 and sent to Syria for a year to be tortured despite having no terrorist (...) (18 years ago, 29-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
all, rights
(score: 1.202)
|
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) It's pretty sketchy. You could define "rebellion" as a group of citizens who take action against the government. But does that action necessarily require that it's an armed action, or a physically destructive one? What if they were hacking in (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.200)
|
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) John, with due respect, you don't know that. Many of these detainees were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time, or they were mistaken for someone else, or they were coerced into fighting against invading US forces. We have only the word (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.200)
|
|
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
| (...) never (...) true. (...) West (...) years (...) Bank. (...) disagree (...) years, (...) refugees (...) be (...) media (...) Israel. (...) This excerpt from one of Mona Charen's articles conters your argument far better than I can and includes (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.193)
|
|
| | Re: A hypothetical economics question...
|
| (...) leave (...) That's true to some extent. But isn't it changing the rules mid-game every time new laws are passed? Obviously we're discussing a much larger change than just adjusting our property tax rate up .25% to pay for school renovation or (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.161)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.155)
|
|
| | Re: Copyright/Fair use question
|
| (...) It is true that copyrights are dominated by corporations, but the idea that the author should have control over his work is still valid. Limited sharing with friends should be encouraged since this will entice some of them to buy the work for (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.149)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| With every gun debate I see/read, it seems to me more people would rather live unarmed. I seems likely to me that, within my lifetime, guns will be outlawed from private citizens. Why do I think this likely? Because I just don't see enough people (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.142)
|
|
| | ??? (was Re: An armed society...(what if?))
|
| (...) LFB, Kirby is a little too conspiracy prone for my taste also (really, it's his one obvious debate flaw), but that doesn't mean that he is wrong -- the fact is, Kirby is right in most of the broader strokes of his statements, even if he screws (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.141)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| (...) So let's see, people who don't come to the same conclusion as you do, given the same evidence, are ignorant? No--rather, I'd argue that you've determined the "truth"--or the end conclusion--before you went out looking for evidence. I'm still (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.141)
|
|
| | Re: FOTY, at least for me.
|
| (...) But you see NC State is wrong. Even those people are doing a service. My former employer got season ticks to the Pistons one year, and they were more hapless than usual, winning hardly any important games. So it got to where the firm was (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.139)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.139)
|
|
| | Plowed Ground
|
| (...) Speaking of which, you've mentioned previously that "all rights are property rights" or something to that effect. I won't ask you to rehash it all for me, but do you recall approximately when or in what context that was first discussed here? (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.138)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.137)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 1.136)
|
|
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
| (...) What I actually said was this: (from) (URL)Tell you what though, Scott. Pick one point, one thought, one item that (...) and again: (from) (URL)I'll repeat my offer though. If Scott picks one point or small topic and (...) Note the use (in (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.136)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.136)
|
|
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) If you think they're worth doing, by all means, please go ahead. However since they involve transfers of wealth from one person to another, my position is that you ought to do them on your nickel, not mine. I am not my brother's keeper unless (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.128)
|
|
| | Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
|
| (...) Scott, of course, snipped the subordinate clause I put on there, the clause showing a balance of rights so that all rights are respected. As is his wont. Snip away what might disagree with your point or show that the other side is reasonable. (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.125)
|
