|
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.273)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
 | | Re: namecalling
|
| (...) Which was partly (if not all) the result of quotes from the press. (...) Put a Warhead in the middle, and you'll have Cerberus (ya know, the dog that guarded the Styx...) ;-) Pedro (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Re: Value of NATO?
|
| (...) Precisely. For the time being, there is no need for an European Army - there are no threats! Although I argue there is a need to start testing its future appearance, out of precaution alone; after all, the best way to avoid wars is still not (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Re: Poverty myths?
|
| (...) Of course it is, but it is pure luck on their part that they are placed there. Assuming that this where their wealth derives it has not come from their ingenuity or their political system. (...) I tend to think there is a link but that you (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Re: Poverty myths?
|
| (...) In my utterly limited study of dynamic systems analysis, I remember several examples (most of which I forget the specifics of, tho remember the jist) where the 'gut reaction' was to help people/societies/etc by giving money/aid/etc, which just (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Re: Poverty myths?
|
| (...) No, Hong Kong is a city and a Special Administrative Region OF China. The British handed the territory over to Chine, they did not grant it independance. Perhaps you're thinking Singapore? (...) Again, it's a city. Any comparison can be made (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Re: namecalling
|
| (...) You are mixing political satire with being offensive. I just don't see the point of calling someone's comments "hatful", ungrateful or as being "divorced from reality" as being all that constructive. I’d have been less concerned if you had (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Back on track... (was Re: namecalling
|
| (...) Don't worry, Dave, it's not hijacked. It's just been temporarily diverted but is back on track now. (...) He's been caught out, we can move on. Everyone just needs to ignore all the responses you know we're going to get, trying to prove black (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Re: namecalling
|
| (...) Well spotted on the hypocrisy - he's just grinding his usual axe. And I wish to note that I have great respect for the way Frank expresses his opinions (we could all learn a lesson by emulating him). But, ummmmm, errrrr, I'd agree with most of (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | namecalling
|
| (...) (URL) gives "an ungrateful person", or "a person who shows no gratitude"... none of the meanings it lists have any negative connotation beyond that. Ya, that's namecalling all right. (1) But of course, words like "airhead", "poodle", "lapdog", (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Re: namecalling
|
| (...) Oh, ya... me too. But that's not the point of my post. (...) On Wintel machines, Launch MSWord and type "(tm)" and it turns into the superscript TM symbol. Then paste the symbol in to your post. That works for many (but not all) browsers. I (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.272)
|
