Results 4041 – 4060 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) Let's look at the exact wuote then, shall we?(seeing as how it;s right at the end of the article, it's pretty easy to find...) " I am not comparing the U.S. to Nazi Germany. But one does begin to understand in all this how the Germans, another (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) Um, why isn't this an impeachable offense? (I admit it, my wife dinged me for this... she pointed out that I was screaming for the head of Clinton because he was an admitted perjurer (over something relatively unimportant, but the principle of (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) Perfectly agreed--SH's finagling and ousting inspectors and flaunting UN resolutions was a terrible thing. No one has ever stated that SH wasn't a tyrannical dictator with much blood on his hands. But at the time in question--from just before (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) You're almost right here, but you're doing things in the wrong order. Heal the sick people of their neuroses first. Then strike down the no longer needed laws designed to protect them from the consequences of these neuorses. (...) How can you (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Isn't that a majority? (...) I'm saying that laws that infringe on one's personal freedom's are wrong. The Principle of Life Ownership states: "I own my own life. I can do whatever I want to with it. This is a right that I take for myself. No (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Correct, the bar will be raised, as it was from ankles to breasts. Next will be the sexualization of our youth (which has already begun). What all of this amounts to is the decay of civility-- an amoral route to anarchy. JOHN (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) People seem to have to state that these days if they start talking about the US administration leading the people down the primrose path, hyping up the 'terror alerts'. Funny how the comparison is, well, not an exact fit, as hardly any (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: And so it continues....
|
| (...) You still have hockey up there? I thought all the Canadian teams were getting bought up and moving south. Someday all your teams will be in Florida or Carolina with a brand new stadium and no fans, just like the one that used to play around (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| (...) It is improbable, but not impossible. Surely, the key must then be that you should have the respect of your kids before you encounter your extreme life-or-death scenario? We don’t share the same culture or kids, but for me beating children is (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| (...) Honestly considering tantrums is a somewhat humbling experience for parents. You can pretty explicitly track the cause of the tantrum to failure to act on the part of the parents. I've been there and done that. It's been my fault. It might be (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| Larry, I did think that Nik was a courteous young man. And I don't mean to suggest that you can not get acceptable, even good, results in turning a child into an adult with corporal punishment as a tool. I was spanked. I'm OK. But I do question how (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Wow! A great day of debate!
|
| I just thought I'd mention that. An absolute plethora of good posts, replies and followups, with relatively no 'offense' ('xept by me, but that was yesterday ;) ) Chris is actually swaying me to his slant of child rearing, and the skin thing just (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Then why not my morality? What makes yours so much better? That's my point. (...) Exactly *which* freedom of yours was abused by Janet Jackson's bare breast? (...) I find ponytails sexy. Is hair a sexual part? Every body part is as sexual as (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote: <snip lots of weel thgouht out and implemented stuff> (...) Wow Chris, that's a whole different slant that I hadn't considered. Nicely done. To continue the discussion with maybe a specific (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) So we pass laws to lower the hemline back to ankles? There should be a difference between sex and, well, not sex. And this issue of toplessness falls on the non-sex side, or at least it should, for there are societies today that have no (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) The example you gave above regarding woman being cover is flawed. The woman in that society choose to cover up. We might not see it as choice since Islamic law dictates it, but think of it from their perspective. They were brought up in a (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Morality issue, out of bounds for legislators - shouldn't it be so? Larry? (...) Would you be kind enough to ellaborate? I seem to recall you advocating some sort of "absolute freedom" concept earlier in o-t.d, but my memory may be failing. It (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| | Re: Magnificent!
|
| (...) WEll, maybe not quite 'nuff said after all. (URL) Here's> a prescient article from very early in Dubya's monarchy. (21 years ago, 29-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.308)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.307)
|
|
| | Re: And so it continues....
|
| (...) Yeah, but which local guy got your soldiers into that place, and why? You see, I don't care why you care. I just want to learn a bit more about what goes on in the rest of the world. You live there, so you're in a reasonable position to tell (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.307)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
