To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 3861 – 3880 of about 12000.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in liberated Iraq"
 
(...) ... and until the weekend Bush was adamant it was infiltrators (Syrians, Iranians, Chechnyan’s etc) and "Sadam loyalists" who were to blame for the trouble. Scott A (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) I did see the episode - my virgin eyes were spared by recropping the shot? Not that that sequence made the slightest ounce of sense in regards to Vulcans. T'Pol either was dropped on her pointy ears as a child or is suffering from undiagnosed (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
Christopher Weeks wrote in message <3880E975.C4916B4E@e...se.net>... (...) world (...) Baggage, hindrance... Yeah, your right, Chris. (...) While there is the similarity of the desire for a small central government with a limited amount of power in (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Libertarian stuff
 
(...) Two things. First off, how did the tax break get there in the first place? Second, the tax break just makes it cheaper to contribute to an approved charity, it doesn't improve the actual bottom line. (...) To be honest, I have yet to see any (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) You're forgetting that you were forewarned that the half-time show was being brought to you by the letters M and TV. Even with that 'heads up', you still sit there and say "I didn't know the halftime show was going to be tasteless!"? (...) The (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Now we're handcuffing 9 year olds
 
(URL) watch out for them dangerous criminals, after all, they might be in danger of gaining sympathy when they start to cry. What on earth is our world coming to? Back when I was growing up, this kind of incident probably wouldn't have even involved (...) (21 years ago, 9-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: They Know Where You Are!
 
"Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...areDOTcom> wrote in message news:Hvuy9o.16uv@lugnet.com... (...) So my (...) are off (...) street (...) the (...) Terraserver had the house I grew-up in on the wrong side of a river - about half a mile from (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: An Alternative..
 
Its late, I may be too tired to think straight (1). At first glance, I had plenty of arguments and questions, but I don't feel those are necessary just yet. I think the system you are trying to devise is our current world. Since man began, we have (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.314)

  Re: An Alternative..
 
(...) Please don't hold back on the questions :) (...) I have to respectfully disagree! * Power is bottom up, not top down. * State Funding is at a minimum - you pay for what you want. * Individuals are offered a role in community issues and at a (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Another horrific story out of Fallujah
 
(...) Worst of all: he’ll get away with it. As a related aside, this was in Saturday's (URL) Guardian> (ie before yesterday's uprising): I have gone to the mosques and street demonstrations and listened to Muqtada al-Sadr's supporters shout "Death (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) Of course, there's absolutely no way to implement that policy effectively, or to police it credibly, unless we have a clear, precise, and consistent definition of what qualifies as pornography. Who would care to posit such a definition? (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) I have only recently returned from a family vacation and was content to lurk around a while, but since my name was envoked, I thought I'd comment on Alanis' behavior and the pious criticism of America's "prudishness". Let's cut to the chase, (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
 
(...) Where this falls down is in the area of expectations. We can use turning Stern off in advance of his broadcast as an effective way of not listening to what we don't want to listen to, precisely because we have an expectation already set about (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
James, (...) Can you please give me examples on how corporations can take away your freedom, your liberty, your rights, etc.? The government can and does. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator/CAD (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.314)

  Re: A New Threat
 
(...) I hear you all, probably that link was to "R" rated for FBTB.. But I had to post it, it's one of the funniest creations I've seen in a long time.. I can't stop laughing whenever comes to mind..LOL. And Allister, you're last comment is a sad (...) (21 years ago, 2-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) That is what I was thinking as well. (...) Interesting... (...) I am wondering, especially Matt Miller, view on rights. He keeps calling on them, but doesn't really say what he thinks. Scott S. P.S. Larry, I read most of the Libertarian (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Another horrific story out of Fallujah
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello wrote regarding (URL) link>. (...) If I understand Dubya's agenda, he'll be evacuating on June 30th out of fear. Granted, troops will remain in Iraq, but the withdrawal-at-all-costs is a cowardly tactic to (...) (21 years ago, 5-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.314)

  Re: RFC: An Alternative..
 
(...) The shift of power from top-down to bottom-up is a major difference straight off. The Social Groupings that I named will sound familiar, as we do have a structure already in place for community and society.. I could have used different terms (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
John Neal wrote in message <386E6426.576F7583@u...st.net>... (...) he (...) in (...) anyway) (...) no (...) know (...) this (...) I don't pretend to know anything about any here after. Perhaps there is one, but it makes about as much difference to (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

property
(score: 0.314)

  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Hope you stay well! (...) Brazil has a massive problem too. I think I'd laid off Libertarianism in this one, and I was focussing on the assertion made that children wouldn't suffer because of life-affirmation, that people wouldn't walk past a (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights
(score: 0.314)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR