Results 3501 3520 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Reading in steep decline?
|
| (...) I'm not particularly troubled. I hope to see the day when computers have fairly direct interfaces with meat. If/when that comes around, people won't read at all, really. Will that be a tragedy? I think this is just a sign of progress. On the (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Mormon bashing again
|
| (...) Creationism is actually very scientific. Many secular scientists have become christians precisely because their findings lead them to the conclusion that everything is too complex to be accidental. I have a few books I could mail to you that (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Sarcasm
|
| (...) I think this might not be formatted quite right, I think you need to put the http:// part on the front or else LUGNET thinks it is a relative link (shifted to plaintext so you could see it, but go upthread and try clicking on it to see what (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Reading in steep decline?
|
| (...) Err, do you forsee the computers of that day as more akin to the library, or the television? It could take the term couch potato to a whole new level. (...) Wild, but interesting speculation. It has all the makings of a really good SF book. (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Mormon bashing again
|
| I suggest anyone who wants more insight into what the founding fathers intended, check out this site: (URL) particular reference to the posting of the Ten Comandments, here is one little quote from the article on relion: (...) To me this suggests (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
| (...) Sorry, I can't help notice, Dave, that you left off the end of Larry's message talking about baiting. Also, I'm not sure that anyone else cares who is right, you or him, other than the two of you. I've watched the two of you get into it on (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Sarcasm
|
| (...) From the internet. <www.cogsci.princeto...-bin/webwn Sarcasm: witty language used to convey insults or scorn>. Hee, hee. Don't know how I could have missed the insults and scorn. But you're right, I'm wrong. I see you are a funny guy after (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Reading in steep decline?
|
| (...) Various unorganized thoughts: --While web surfing does involve a lot of reading, this is generally in very small bites, distracted by a lot of colorful eye-candy. It's like the contrast between USA Today and the New York Times. Reading books (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
| (...) Indeed it was, but you wholy missed the point in your zealous rush to criticize me yet again. I wasn't objecting to your use of my own words, but to your callous treatment of my statements by way of making a big public show of ignoring them. (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) | More: Next Page >>
|