 | | Re: Trying to understand —Dan Boger
|
| | | On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:27:57 GMT "Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote concerning 'Re: Trying to understand': (...) I agree that there should be better education - but as long as guns are around, accidents will happen. IDF [1] makes (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | Update: Billy boy just said "Kids are dying everyday (Unless Congress passes new gun control laws), they don't know it's an election year." Al Gore was babbling about campaign finance reform, he is the one who can't even follow the laws in the first (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | | (...) wrote (...) I don't see how a trigger lock is an attempt to get rid of guns. A trigger lock is SUPPOSED to help prevent an accidental discharge from a gun, over and above what the safety switch is for. Do you think there was this much debate (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | | (...) how is this "trying tog et rid of guns"? solve problems like kids shooting themselves when they "just wanted to look at it"... hurt others? like not being able to shoot fast enough? well, if you keep your gun under your pillow, you probably (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | Dan, (...) How can requiring gun manufacturers, providing this gun lock, making the consumer pay more (I don't care how "cheap" it is, this is used for taxes as well, and I don't buy it), and them going in the trash, going to solve anything? Bad (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | | | (...) gun (...) It's not the solution to the bigger problem, but I don't see how it's a bad idea. Are you railing against the seatbelts in your car because they impede your movement when you're driving and trying to change the radio station? It's a (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —James Simpson
|
| | | | | | (...) I mostly agree with you. A dominant political philosophy of the last 8 years has been that government can & should solve all social problems. There is an inordinate amount of faith in the power of legislation, and a belief that the ends (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | James, (...) Oh, I know it is the parents whose ultimate responsibility to teach the children, but I would rather have the NRA teach about guns to my children then any government agency. (...) Indeed. Schools should not be allowed to teach that (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Today. Seat belts were once required equipment on cars but not required to be worn by passengers. Flawed analogy but the principle holds. It is not a large leap from "all A will be supplied with X under penalty of law" to "all citizens with A (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | Another News Update on this horrendous issue: Bill C. is still going on about how these new laws will somehow save children, but the real kicker is Janet Reno, on how Bill Clinton has made the children safest of any presidents, he is the greatest (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Dan Boger
|
| | | | On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 17:12:37 GMT "Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote concerning 'Re: Trying to understand': (...) just a side note - if nuclear weapons were used, I really am not going to worry about the pets and trees killed... :/ Dan (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | (...) I know, I was throwing in some liberal sentiments for diversity's sake, environmentalism and animal-rights. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
