Subject:
|
Re: High Crimes and Misdemeaners (was Impeachment)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Jan 1999 17:16:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
375 times
|
| |
|
|
I think you're right, although it seems to imply that a president could
be impeached for jaywalking. The upshot appears to be that whatever
the House and Senate consider impeachable is impeachable.
as evah,
John C.
Larry Pieniazek writes:
> John Cromer wrote:
>
> > ps to Larry P: I did a non-case-sensitive search through the 85
> > Federalist Papers at
> > http://www.augur.demon.co.uk/federalist-papers/index.htm for "high
> > crimes" and came up with zip. A more specific reference to a Federalist
> > Paper would help me.
>
> I did some digging and I could not find it either. Well, somebody ELSE
> said it was, and I should have verified it before I alleged. But I'd be
> willing to bet (since you can't call me on it, they're all dead now)
> that what I outlined was what was intended by the authors.
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Impeachment
|
| (...) I did some digging and I could not find it either. Well, somebody ELSE said it was, and I should have verified it before I alleged. But I'd be willing to bet (since you can't call me on it, they're all dead now) that what I outlined was what (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
