To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 338
337  |  339
Subject: 
Re: Impeachment
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 4 Jan 1999 16:53:31 GMT
Viewed: 
1063 times
  
Lee Jorgensen writes:
> John, currently there are over 115 people in jail for perjury.  Of
> those 115, at least 5 have come forward to say that their perjury
> was for a sex related cover-up.


I guess my point is that 115 people is a minute fraction of the number
of people who lie under oath in this country and that the equation:
perjury == treason (for example) doesn't hold.

> 
> I ask you, why did the president settle the Paula Jones case then?
> Even though a settlement supposedly admits no guilt, after many
> months of denial, why settle?


So he wouldn't have to deal with it any more.  Cases without merit are
often settled just to avoid the hassle and cost.

> I fear that if the president is NOT removed, that the presidency could
> become more like a King.  He works for You.  Would you like an
> employee to lie to you?

I imagine I've been lied to by a number of presidents many times.  I
take it in stride depending on the seriousness of the issue I'm being
lied to about.  If it's about bombing Cambodia, I get irritated.  If
it's about diddling somebody with a cigar, ... well, you can figure out
the rest.

as evah,

John C.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Impeachment
 
(...) Lying under oath != Perjury. They are two separate issues. Perjury is the active and repeated lying under oath, with intent to cover up information, and to thwart the legal system. A Lie, is may not be considered perjury, if it's about (...) (28 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Impeachment
 
John, currently there are over 115 people in jail for perjury. Of those 115, at least 5 have come forward to say that their perjury was for a sex related cover-up. Perjury is the thoughtful willingness to lie to the court. I'd say that yes, the (...) (28 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

16 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR