 | | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | (...) Trying not to take this out of context or anything, when you say hose, are you saying store, as in storing the balls? I am slightly confused & perplexed on my own, not by you or anything, I think I need more coffee..... (...) Really? What ones (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) In your original statement, you said "hose" when I assume you meant "house". I was just making fun (sorry for being off-topic...) (...) To a pure Libertarian, laws telling you that your store must serve anyone regardless of race (ect), are an (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | (...) Oops, I did. Ugh, I can't wait to go to bed tonight! :) (...) Hmm.. that is interesting, I don't know how Libertarians would view that. I never thought that the first part was bad. I will have the great Larry P. on that one... I think the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yea, sounds like you need some sleep, or you need to bow down to the great Larry more so you don't make as many misteaks... (...) Things like benefits for domestic partners, having personel policies which state that the company doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | (Something - I don't know what anymore) Was [Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging] —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ah yes, to not make misteaks like the great Larry.... All Hail Larry! ;) (...) I don't think people should discriminate on the basis of sexual preference, but I don't think it should be an issue in the first place. Some try to make it seem so, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) So how would the situation be in the southern states? The black population _didn't_ have cash to spend, and they didn't have much chance of improving that either. Would gays be open about being gay like they are now, without the entire (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Simplistic answer is that they DID have cash to spend, it was economic boycott that finally broke the "back of the bus" thing with buses, and was going to break down a great deal more quite soon. As for the legal barriers, Laws REQUIRING (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | Scott E. Sanburn wrote in message <386A5CF5.B1434BC3@c...eb.net>... (...) all (...) Treating (...) Just a comment, when did regulation of the waste disposal industry occur? Around the same time that Civil Rights was in full swing? While the Civil (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
