 | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) You, know - "things" (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Really. So what exactly are you "strongly" suggesting that I internalize? JOHN (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament reActs
|
|
Hi, Nathan. (...) So noted. :) Though I've moved this to ot.debate because it isn't really a discussion of the LEGO constructions themselves nor how I've chosen to illustrate Bible passages with LEGO. (...) Hmm. I actually thought it was one of the (...) (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Perfectly normal expression, at least here in Aus. It roughly translates as 'I strongly suggest you internalise things, and move on." (...) I'm not sure it meets his stringent criteria, but I appreciate the gesture, so I'll just say (...) (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) "Pull your head in"? "hypocrit"? Austroll. Ha, think Richie will add that to his (URL)? (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Pull your head in, hypocrit. (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Very well said. I've always been of the opinion that the *individual* can make decisions for him or herself with regards to, well, almost anything. That said, corporations, institutions, and whathaveyou--stating these almost 'edicts'--"The (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Very well said. I've always been of the opinion that the *individual* can make decisions for him or herself with regards to, well, almost anything. That said, corporations, institutions, and whathaveyou--stating these almost 'edicts'--"The (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Hi, all-- This is yet another example of why one's faith should color one's decisions. I make a living working for a Bible School. I would be considered "Evangelical" and/or "Conservative" by a good many people. I attend church when I'm not on (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Why don't they just call the position 'His Holiness The President' and be done with it? It seems to be what they (unreasonably) expect from him, and any candidates for the position, anyway (and 'they' are not just religious people either). (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) It's completely hypocritical. I understand why people might think divorces are relevant. They're a character issue. And like it or not, people judge others based on character. If you've been arrested 11 times for various robberies, thefts, or (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) I read it later and I should have specified that--one does *not* need to be perfect to criticise. However, people pointing out that Rudy is *bad* because of his divorces (however public they may have been) when they themselves have sexual (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Well, you are implying that one needs to be perfect to criticize, which I don't think is fair. But I will say that I don't think that particular issue has anything to do with the job for which Wudy is wunning. (...) One bad apple (or bushel;-) (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(URL) Tennessee (AP) -- A Southern Baptist leader said Tuesday that evangelical voters might tolerate a divorced presidential candidate, but they have deep doubts about GOP hopeful Rudy Giuliani, who has been married three times. " Yeah, and i have (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Lego Ban' at Seattle School Fueled by Anti-Private Property Crusaders
|
|
(...) Right! Anyone should be allowed to walk into your home, treat your house with disrespect, and call you evil when you object. (...) Of course, because civil engineering has taught us that all humans of every culture fit very neatly and easily (...) (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Lego Ban' at Seattle School Fueled by Anti-Private Property Crusaders
|
|
(...) Hmm. If I was a kid in this class I'd steal my teacher's car. How could they press charges, given their professed beliefs? Bruce (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
This is directed to all people who would like to see sanctions against Ross. (...) I am so sorry that I haven't received Ross' and Eric's emails regarding this matter (both sent before Bob's posting), because if I would have received one of them or (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Gimme a break. This is a prank gone wrong, not an abuse of power. Deleting all of a member's posts, or breaking links in a way that couldn't be restored, that would be an abuse. This was actually a little bit funny (and a little mean, I (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) So it's OK for you to abuse administrative privilege, as long as only one or two people are bothered by it? Especially if one of the two is a person that a significant people on LUGNET feel it's OK to bully? I just have to post here to say I (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) No. The admins will determine if I crossed any line, and take action as necessary. (...) Firstly, that has nothing to do with the point I was making about wanting ALL admins to be "in the loop" when someone "contacts admin". And secondly, the (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
