 | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
|
--snip-- I think this entire argument can be put down to a disagreement over what evidence is applicable to the use in the argument. I think you're as unlikely to convince me that your choices are valid as I am to convince you that mine are. We are (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) I think you should start writing in English first. (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Once again obfuscation--my replies to your comments-- 'I’ve stayed out of this thread until this comment. There is no evidence that Eric is in anyway better than this. There is plenty of evidence that he is not. Just because people get a rise (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Tim's beef behavior
|
|
(...) I stand before your awesomeness. I yeild oh great brick master Tim. For your awesomeness is so great how can I build ye. The bricks are to small, I am afraid I can not compete. \\\...\\\ (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) --snip-- (...) If you think that Eric deserves an apology then perhaps you should apologise to him. Since you had as much to do with the original issue as I did then you owe him an apology as much as I do. Furthermore I've never argued that (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) (*this is such a joke, I am just having fun in the way I transcribe the events*) Righgght! Brilliant, and upon further research one can plainly see, that another party, usual suspect, utters a complaint unto Eric Sophie's person, there by (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Tim's beef behavior
|
|
(...) Why bother? I was legally allowed to use them and given your typical behaviour I find it very unlikely you would volunteer to let me use them to poke fun at you. You can twist and turn all you like but what you did was morally wrong in my (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) I couldn't give a rats ass about DMCA, 'fair usage', 'freedom of speech' or '1st ammendment rights' or whatever people are going on about now--it's all obfuscating the actual issue. (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Tim's beef behavior
|
|
(...) -Snip- (...) -snip- (...) I bow to your awesomeness. Ever think to ask for the images? That was "Outside" LUGNET, now What'd I do "On" LUGNET? Again, bowing to your awesomeness. (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) And the American Government... (URL) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Eric, The last thing you did wrong was to submit a DMCA image against me for an image the wasn't breaching your copyright. The image was legal. As I have explained to you by email it is called Fair Use for parody. That happened a few days ago (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
Tim, what was the last thing I did wrong? Refresh our memories and back up your story. Then tell me what any of this has to do with you or the Technic Side bar and Ross's actions. Since you like to molest my images, having broke the law several (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Hurry up, Global Warming (to my neighborhood!)
|
|
(...) Yeah, we missed those temps by a week:-( Hey, what's up? I was in Tucson all last week-- didn't you this (URL) this>? AZAFOLs unite! JOHN FUT.us/az (18 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hurry up, Global Warming (to my neighborhood!)
|
|
(...) Vunny stuff - but it was 81 here in Tucson the other day and mid 70s today - so your chart needs some additions I'm afraid :-) (18 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Hurry up, Global Warming (to my neighborhood!)
|
|
I was on vacation last week to Arizona, and the temps were in the 50's. No problem though, since the high temps back home in Minnesota were below zero! It's since warmed up to the single digits, but this is getting old fast! My brother-in-law sent (...) (18 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
For full disclosure, I should note that clicking on (URL) results in reload and a final URL of (URL) it's still asking for payment to read the article. (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
Dave, I access your original link, and I get: ---...--- Arar to stay on watch list, U.S. says PAUL KORING AND JEFF SALLOT From Tuesday's Globe and Mail WASHINGTON, OTTAWA — Maher Arar should remain on the security watch list barring him from the (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
I know you were writing to John, but... (...) Well, probably for a while longer. My thing is that we've taken on a responsibility by mucking things up in Iraq. What we've done so far has be pretty bad. What we'd be doing by bailing out would be even (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) Tom, I'd never knowingly link to a site that requires paying--I've never done so before and I still haven't--I don't have to pay for that site, so I can't figure out why you have to. (...) I found the free info and posted it. You know me--I'm (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) So you see no problem with spending a TRillion dollars per country for the war on terror? How long do you think the US can do this before a total collapse? Regardless of our rosy economy, if we insist on spending a TRillion dollars on Iraq (...) (18 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
