Subject:
|
Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:48:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
956 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
It’s also funny that Clinton is still ridiculed for discussing the meaning
of is as it pertained to a legal extramarital affair between two adults,
but no one in the media is complaining about Dubya’s wholesale manipulation
of language.
|
I think I know why. The stakes are so much higher now that it is too horrifying
to accept. Most people I know, as far as I can figure, simply refuse to believe
that President Bush was lying to us the whole time to gain approval to pursue
his own agenda. I think that with all the lives that have been lost, many
people are just unwilling to accept the evidence. When it was Clinton, nothing
but self-respect was at stake.
I’m not interested in making fun of ‘the masses’ for this. I think it’s a
fascinating social phenomenon. It seems like you can point to most of our wars
and see similar acceptance. I wonder how this played out with Vietnam...anyone
out there old enough to discuss it (I was born a few months after my dad was
drafted).
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
