To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24341
24340  |  24342
Subject: 
freeper stuff
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:52:14 GMT
Viewed: 
913 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   I was also at the Freepers yipping ground today and one guy had a whole list of links to articles detailing the love fest between SH and AQ. Most of the links were right back to Freeper articles, though.

Hey thanks, I never heard of a freeper before, but google has.

Here’s the top link from a list on the yipping ground.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/946809/posts?page=1

While it does point to a freeper page, the page itself contains many quotes from various international newspapers. Are you suggesting these are all freeper newspapers, or something like that?

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Parsons wrote:
   Its like treating the various newspapers in Don’s other post (which for the most part seem to recycle government media sources or are heavy on opinion as opposed to facts) as somehow authoritative compared to the work of the 911 Commission. Simply picking the news you like without considering or weighing the sources lets you support whatever you feel like, pretty much regardless of the underlying facts. It gives you a nice warm glow to know that your own uninformed (and quite possibly horrifyingly blinkered) guess turns out to be right, but it doesn’t address or improve anything. Indeed, it prevents others from addressing or improving anything and simply preserves blissful ignorance.

Cool huh?

Whatever. I simply dug up the link because Dave’s original post mentioned it and then immediately dismissed it with a somewhat misleading comment. With that link you and others are now free to interpret it as you wish.

Now that’s cool.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Back to the Real Wasteland of the mind
 
(...) Hard to see this as simply counter-spin. Indeed, its a bit light on for spin at all. It is a grave concern when folks can't seperate the spin from the facts. Its like treating the various newspapers in Don's other post (which for the most part (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

20 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR