 | | Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.
|
|
(...) Yeah, it's weird. I got in somehow without signing up. I think I pasted the link into the URL bar and fixed it up to end with .html. Then it served up the article and also must've redirected me to the odd looking mangled link. Now I get the (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) Odd. When I tested the link in the post preview page it worked. Now I can't even get to it using the article search on www.philly.com. Must be after a few days it goes to only registered users. Quite annoying. Given that the newspaper has (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) Not the "liberal media" again! Was it them who hid the WMD from George? Did they invent the story about (URL) this picture>? Or even this (URL) story>? Scott A (21 years ago, 30-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) The "security contractor" (mercenary) is (URL) here> too. (URL) An other> of his mates got the same e-mail. In fact, if you search the web, you'll see he mailed the letter to quite a lot of "friends”... like this (URL) one>. Please read this (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) You do know that it is a matter of public record that slightly over 80 percent of American journalists are registered Democrats right? (...) You also know that John Kerry in early 2002 (and Bill Clinton when he was president) are both on (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) I'm not sure how relevant that is (if true). I'd imagine it's the view of the editor and owner that hold sway. Remember, every-single-one of Rupert Murdoch's 50+ papers supported the war... he also owns Fox News. The right leaning nature of (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) Yep, maybe the War on Terrorism will be the (URL) to End All Wars> ROSCO (21 years ago, 2-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) Its relevant because most printed editorials in my local papers are liberal propaganda. (...) Yup, that is a good source of conservative propaganda. (...) See overall the media is dead center. That is why liberals think it is right wing biased (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) Inquirer (...) media" (...) relations. (...) over 80 (...) liberal (...) Your comment sounds more than a little subjective. (...) Rupert (...) So we agree that your country’s main TV news source is not liberal? (...) a fact. (...) is right (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Being realistic
|
|
(...) (URL) Things are worse> than I understood: the CIA's former counter-terrorism chief Cofer Black has been quoted as saying about interrogation techniques that "after 9/11, the gloves came off". It is now being reported that there have been (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) And yours aren't as well? (...) Fox is hardly the country's main news source. The much more liberal leaning ABC, NBC, and CBS are the big three. (...) Re-read the previous sentance as it answers your question. (...) The UN has never in its (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) I wonder what Diem's thoughts on the matter would be? Pedro (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) (URL) This> kills both your points. (...) The last time I looked the UN disarmed Iraq... then Bush invaded. (...) Why ask and then ignore the answer? (...) Who hand-picked the IGC? Who decides who gets power at the end of June? Who rigged the (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) So Fox a free network channel has better ratings than CNN a 'pay for' cable channel. What does that have to do with ABC, NBC, and CBS (all free network channels) all having better ratings than Fox? (...) If you actually belive that, it (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) Oops. Is (URL) this> any better? (...) Read (URL) this>. (...) lol. So he only wanted to involve the international community on his terms? (...) BTW: I thought we'd already established that Bush is not interested in eliminating dictatorships (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
|
|
(...) That's not really a good comparison, though. FOX is a 24-hour news/propaganda outlet, while ABC and NBC are entertainment channels with occasional news coverage (and pretty crappy coverage, at that). CBS is also an entertainment channel and (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
