 | | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Infinity *does* exist, and it's in lots of places all around us. Find the terminus (in two dimensions) of the surface of a sphere, for one example. The duplicity of Dubya, for another (I hope that this one is merely a jest, though I'm not yet (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) :) (...) And I agree with many of your assessments, which is why I'm having 'issue' with the 'Church Proper' right now. It was clearly illuminated when I read that cute story about the answer to the question "Is Hell exothermic or endotheric". (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) True, but your formulation of this example is incorrect. The ink line is not made of an infinite number of infinitely small "points" of ink; rather, the line is made of a finite (but quite large) number of very small (but quite finite) (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, and I can sit in my swivel chair and spin from now until "the end of time", never stopping the spin (excluding such contingencies as death and parts on chair wearing out) but, again, that only works 'on paper'. IN real world applications, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) I think I'm guilty of an imprecision here. I meant that the path of the laser is effectively infinite, not that it would traverse an endlessly new part of the sphere's surface. Also, as long as we're talking about two dimensions instead of (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) I'd rephrase again--the path is theoretically infinite, for if you set up this exact scenario using real life lasers, ball-bearings nad spinning tools, within a set amount of time something will break down--or the path of the laser, over time, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) I think you're blurring the distinction between "impractical in practice" and "impossible in reality." Whether or not we can devise an mechanism that will exist for eternity is irrelevant. The fact that we can create an unbounded (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) I concur--a concept of infinity existing on a two dimensional surface of a sphere is a valid one. But the operative word here is *concept*. In reality, in the physical universe, the surface isn't infinite for it is subject to the finite issues (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: Please read this whole post (or at least the bottom part) before replying. I may be onto something... (...) Well, let's identify another distinction that seems to be causing us some trouble. You're (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Okay, I've thought about it more. And I've decided that my example is 100% faulty. Even if such a theoretical perfect sphere could be said to exist in the real universe, there'd be no way for us to verify it, because we'd have no way to verify (...) (16 years ago, 6-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) It takes you FIVE YEARS to admit you're wrong, Dave!? Or have you just been thinking about the example for that long? I don't believe that you had even procreated before this discussion. ROFL JOHN (16 years ago, 7-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, it's not as though I was thinking about it every day, but it was sort of bubbling on the back burner, along with a hundred other random things. Jon Palmer's post in ot.pun was another of them, but I already commented on that one a while (...) (16 years ago, 8-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'm not sure what to make of this; I'll get back to you in a few years. JOHN (16 years ago, 10-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'm sure you'll have at least two or three ways of getting in touch with me at that time... Dave! (16 years ago, 11-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) Oooo, there's still hope for Myers-Briggs! DaveE (16 years ago, 10-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) See, this is why people should never admit when they've made a mistake. And I will continue to ridicule the Myers-Briggs Test Instrument while there is breath in my lungs and blood in my veins, thank you very much. Dave! (16 years ago, 11-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) So that's what Christian mathematicians argue about! ;-) JOHN (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Christian historians, too: How many saxons on the head of a pin? -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
