To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21161
21160  |  21162
Subject: 
Re: I think the 1st Ammendment was broken
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:03:18 GMT
Viewed: 
256 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:

   Telling a country that they can’t have a weapons program??

UN res 1441, among others.


   Telling Iraq that they couldn’t have a weapons progam was *not* the reason for this fiasco.

Actually, I think that is precisely the reason.

JOHN

No, the WoMD was--there was nothing in the res. that said that Iraqi’s couldn’t have, say, a factory producing bullets and rifles and such--that’s a weapons program...

To deny a country the right to defend itself is just ludicrous.

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: I think the 1st Ammendment was broken
 
(...) "and such", such as ballistic missiles (Scuds)? (...) If defense is the actual intent. Iraq was an aggressor, and to characterize it, especially with SH at the helm, as anything but is just ludicrous. JOHN (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: I think the 1st Ammendment was broken
 
(...) UN res 1441, among others. (...) Actually, I think that is precisely the reason. JOHN (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

15 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR