To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20124
20123  |  20125
Subject: 
Whose side are you on, anyway?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:53:29 GMT
Viewed: 
235 times
  
More questions about the Russian role are raised in this UPI article:

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030401-024727-1436r

I went to the iraqwar.ru site mentioned

http://www2.iraqwar.ru/iraq-analiz_lenta_w.php?lang=en&archdts=2&lang=en

and I did not see the information given but I wasn't looking very hard. Does
anyone else?



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Whose side are you on, anyway?
 
(...) The whole report appears to be a statement of the obvious from analysts who are allegedly “linked” with the Russian military: ==+== Strikingly, the Russian analysts, whose work appears on the iraqwar.ru Web site, believe that U.S. and Allied (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Newspeak 2003
 
(...) Didn't some of those missiles (GPS guided) go awry while GPS jammers (sold and serviced by Russian companies, as it turns out... probably because they underbid the French) were being deployed? You can't fault the missiles directly for that. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

24 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR