Subject:
|
Re: Newspeak 2003
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 20:13:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
169 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello writes:
> - "unilateral" The root of this word is uni - meaning one or single, Even if
> you feel this war is just the US and UK that would be "bilateral" but then
> the Aussies are involved too, "trilateral"? what is the term for 45 nations
> participating?
Plain, collective dumbness.
Pedro Silva
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Newspeak 2003
|
| (...) This is an easy one, when an organized military wearing the uniforms, and flags of the country they represent acts based on declared military intentions, that is "engagement". When men dressed as civilians feign surrender before they fire on a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
