| |
"Iraqi ultralights spotted over U.S. troops"
http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1720421.php
Maj. Gen. Victor E. “Gene” Renuart Jr., director of operations for Central
Command, was quick to label the bombing as an act of terrorism. “That kind
of an activity is a symbol of an organization that is beginning to get a
little bit desperate,” he added.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So what have I missed? Are we not at war with Iraq? If we kill them we
are "liberating" Iraq, or "engaging" the enemy. If they kill us it is
"terrorism."
Gotcha -- just checking.
Why don't we just call them "subhumans" and break out with the Zyklon B?
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Newspeak 2003
|
| (...) No way! Are you saying that the word "terrorism" is misused to discredit the enemy? I am shocked! Another interesting term is "precision bombing". The US government has officially apologized to the Iranian government for US missiles hitting (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Newspeak 2003
|
| (...) This is an easy one, when an organized military wearing the uniforms, and flags of the country they represent acts based on declared military intentions, that is "engagement". When men dressed as civilians feign surrender before they fire on a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
