Subject:
|
Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:45:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
270 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/03/28/1048653833092.html
> > If it's true, beware of backpedalling Lefties!
>
> John, how obtuse can you be?
>
> Why backpedal? This was predicted by anyone paying attention. I feel quite
> sure I myself have voiced this exact fear one way or another.
That's BS. Cites, please. Even as you question backpedalling you backpedal!
>
> Rummy claimed an "evolving" relationship [note: not necessarily a
> preexisting relationship] between SH and AQ -- which I can readily accept.
> Not only can I accept it, I think it could easily have been foretold. We
> have radicalized the world of Islam.
So it is *our* fault, eh? No, we are the radicals' convenient scapegoat, along
with Israel, the perpetual Arab scapegoat.
> The infidel treads upon their holy
> grounds. This kind of Jihad can probably claim a direct link to their
> scripture, and I believe it does (I am not a muslim, verify it yourself).
Nor am I. Do it yourself.
These AQ are useful religious idiots to Saddam
So presumably then he wouldn't have any qualms about giving them WMD to strike
out at his enemies. You make my case.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
|
| (...) (URL) which I quote an article that in turn quotes author and intelligence expert James Bamford. "There is a predominant belief in the intelligence community that an invasion of Iraq will cause more terrorism than it will prevent. There is (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
|
| (...) John, how obtuse can you be? Why backpedal? This was predicted by anyone paying attention. I feel quite sure I myself have voiced this exact fear one way or another. Rummy claimed an "evolving" relationship [note: not necessarily a preexisting (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
