Subject:
|
Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 07:32:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
191 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > It may be premature to say "I told you so", but this doesn't look good for the
> > case for those who oppose the war.
>
> Get over yourself -- there is no "I told you so"
It's not about me:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/03/28/1048653833092.html
If it's true, beware of backpedalling Lefties!
JOHN
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
|
| (...) John, how obtuse can you be? Why backpedal? This was predicted by anyone paying attention. I feel quite sure I myself have voiced this exact fear one way or another. Rummy claimed an "evolving" relationship [note: not necessarily a preexisting (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
|
| (...) Oh please, from your own cite I give you: "If terrorists are found, it would be the first proof of a direct link..." In other words, there is no proof, and the whole piece is speculation based on a few threats an Iraqi grunt ('no offense') (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
|
| (...) Get over yourself -- there is no "I told you so" until this fiasco is over and the contracts have been settled. I was dismayed at the analysis run on BBC's pages today where the basic assertion was that Iraq was a long term investment and was (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
