To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19988
19987  |  19989
Subject: 
Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:53:28 GMT
Viewed: 
260 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
That's BS.  Cites, please.

http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=19613

In which I quote an article that in turn quotes author and
intelligence expert James Bamford. "There is a predominant belief in the
intelligence community that an invasion of Iraq will cause more terrorism
than it will prevent. There is also a tremendous amount of embarrassment by
intelligence professionals that there have been so many lies out of the
administration -- by the president, (Vice President Dick) Cheney and
(Secretary of State Colin) Powell -- over Iraq."

Just stop it, John.  Everything that comes out of you is one piece of
stupidity piled upon the previous piece of stupidity.  Don't you tire of
losing round after round?

And again, where is the cite I asked of you?  Oh right, you have none --
just the usual unsupported right-wing fanatical blather.

-- Hop-Frog



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Missing Terrorist Link?
 
(...) That's BS. Cites, please. Even as you question backpedalling you backpedal! (...) So it is *our* fault, eh? No, we are the radicals' convenient scapegoat, along with Israel, the perpetual Arab scapegoat. (...) Nor am I. Do it yourself. These (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR