 | | The future of child care —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (URL) thing you know, doctors will be over-prescribing drugs for kids who have trouble sitting through a boring school day. Nah, that'll never happen... By the way, I am not equating the prudent prescription of medication for those who suffer from (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The future of child care —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) But isn't that the direction of society in general right now--any bit of sniffle, any bit of pain, any slight cough, and "dammit, I want my medicine!" Any sort of uncomfortableness and we want a "quick fix"--"why should I suffer the least (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The future of child care —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) It sounds like you're saying that people _should_ suffer. I don't get it. (...) lunacy. It wasn't "his" kid. If I were the parental victim in this case, my wrath would be extreme. Chris (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The future of child care —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | (...) I would never want people to suffer if they didn't have to--I'm not malicious. So here's the catch 22--this guy is suffering due to the child--he obviously feels like he's suffering anyway, so he sets out to 'remedy' his suffering... So should (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The future of child care —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | | (...) My understanding, though correct me if I'm wrong, is that resistant strains are happening because people stop taking the drug as soon as they start feeling better rather than completing their course of treatment. Chris (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The future of child care —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) I think I'd rephrase. People complain too much that they suffer in the least bit. Hence, to sound parental, suffering is good for you-- it builds character. Basically, suffering tends to make a person less of a rampant complainer. In this (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The future of child care —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) debate about? I'm thinking no one is going to stick up for the flight attendant (assuming he actually did it, I mean). (...) Even so, there's a world of difference between a doctor who's theoretically educated in the risks of a medication (or (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of child care —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) It just got my blood up, and I didn't know where else to post. How about ot.fun, Larry? 8^) (...) Absolutely, just as I'd trust a surgeon to remove my appendix more than I'd trust my bus driver to do the same. No argument. Dave! (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of child care —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I sort of can sympathise with the flight attendant, there isn't much worse (on a NORMAL flight, mind you, not one that suffers some disaster) than a crying infant. But no, I'm not going to stick up for him, he violated rights, pretty clearly. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of child care —Jennifer Clark
|
| | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HBr3GH.189p@lugnet.com... (...) There was a fascinating programme on the telly recently with various ex stewards and stewardesses telling stories of their days in the air, and it was (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
