Subject:
|
Re: The future of child care
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Mar 2003 17:26:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
174 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> "why should I suffer the least bit?"
It sounds like you're saying that people _should_ suffer. I don't get it.
> This guy though, giving his kid unprescribed Rx--that is the epitome of
lunacy.
It wasn't "his" kid.
If I were the parental victim in this case, my wrath would be extreme.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The future of child care
|
| (...) I would never want people to suffer if they didn't have to--I'm not malicious. So here's the catch 22--this guy is suffering due to the child--he obviously feels like he's suffering anyway, so he sets out to 'remedy' his suffering... So should (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: The future of child care
|
| (...) I think I'd rephrase. People complain too much that they suffer in the least bit. Hence, to sound parental, suffering is good for you-- it builds character. Basically, suffering tends to make a person less of a rampant complainer. In this (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The future of child care
|
| (...) But isn't that the direction of society in general right now--any bit of sniffle, any bit of pain, any slight cough, and "dammit, I want my medicine!" Any sort of uncomfortableness and we want a "quick fix"--"why should I suffer the least (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
