Subject:
|
Re: What the Confederate flag stands for. (was Re: Just wh...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:15:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
593 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > Slavery was central but it was the secondary issue.
> > Interesting. I'm not sure I can reconcile that claim with Stephen's
> > statements (which assert outright that the institution of slavery is of
> > paramount importance), but at least I understand your view better now.
> > Thanks for the clarification.
>
> I would have to argue that Mike isn't quite understanding what he wrote.
> Slavery was central but a secondary issue? No, it is either not central, or
> it wasn't a secondary issue.
Bruce, I thought I told you before--If you're going to reply to my posts,
I'm going to have to require you to agree with me blindly and absolutely.
Don't ask for clarification when I've already decided to say I understand,
even if I don't (or didn't!)
8^)
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
