Subject:
|
Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:28:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
913 times
|
| |
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message
news:H0s2zn.7z@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.general, James Stacey writes:
> > you have to ask yourself if its economically viable to spend
> > 60% of your time on getting a site to work on less than 5% of browsers.
>
> I don't see this as being that kind of issue -- we are talking about a
> simple left navigation device. 60% of one's time? Just do it right the
> first time and keep reusing the code.
>
> Lugnet, Bricklink, eBay, Amazon, bluelight, target, cdnow, etc. work in
> every browser I have used to view them. Is Lego.com supposed to be some
> kind of weird exception?
>
> I am not complaining that I can't see some latest version Flash animation
> here, I am saying that I can't see the navigation menu. That's pretty • basic...
>
> -- Hop-Frog
OK I agree fully that the navigation is the one item you need to make sure
is working throughout. a simple link to a html only version would be normal
:)
--
James Stacey
---------
www.minifig.co.uk
#925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
| (...) I don't see this as being that kind of issue -- we are talking about a simple left navigation device. 60% of one's time? Just do it right the first time and keep reusing the code. Lugnet, Bricklink, eBay, Amazon, bluelight, target, cdnow, etc. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
