Subject:
|
Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:08:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
739 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.general, James Stacey writes:
> > you have to ask yourself if its economically viable to spend
> > 60% of your time on getting a site to work on less than 5% of browsers.
Lego.com is a site which sells Lego. If the extra 5% of users can pay for
the extra development costs and return a decent margin the answer is "YES".
It is all about costs and benefits.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
| (...) I don't see this as being that kind of issue -- we are talking about a simple left navigation device. 60% of one's time? Just do it right the first time and keep reusing the code. Lugnet, Bricklink, eBay, Amazon, bluelight, target, cdnow, etc. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
