To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15313
    Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Tom Inosanto
   (...) I thought Kevin was an admin of brickshelf, other than that I have no idea. (...) lol, so do I. Land of Lakes medium chedder to be exact `,D (...) So would I, I just found it ironic that he was talking trash about bionice (as well as the (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Jeff Stembel
   (...) Kevin is the Owner, Maintainer, and Administrator of Brickshelf. (...) Why is that Ironic? One doesn't have to like something to make money on it. Fads are notorious for being big money makers for a short period of time. Jon obviously feels (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Tom Inosanto
     (...) Ouch, is that how you treat everything you do not like? Tell me, what product line of Lego do you like... lets trash that, as well as your work for awhile - ok?? Thats what you are doing here.... (...) If it is still there, then it is not (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Tim Courtney
      "tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpIFL7.MEB@lugnet.com... (...) view. Quality MOCs are being overtaken on Brickshelf because of the avatars. They're not permanently hidden, but they're pushed out of the way (and hidden from view (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Tom Inosanto
      (...) I was unaware you were appointed to determine what is quality moc's and what had a right to be on brickshelf.. And there is not an overwhelming amount of these images, thats just you stretching the facts to gan points for you. (...) Agreed, (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Tim Courtney
       "tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpJGnr.Ky4@lugnet.com... (...) news:GpIFL7.MEB@lugnet.com... (...) these (...) what (...) of (...) When did I say they didn't have a right to be on Brickshelf because of that? I was unaware I was (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
      
           Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Larry Pieniazek
        (...) Ouch! I had not heard that particular turn of phrase before and the vision it brings me is *not* a pain free one in any way shape or form. That is the only reason I set XFUT to .fun... to share that vision with y'all. If you feel like (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
       
            Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Tim Courtney
        "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GpJzGt.3DJ@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) Are you saying you haven't heard the expression before period? I grew up with it myself. Translated 'la de frikkin da' or 'whoop de doo for (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
       
            Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Larry Pieniazek
        (...) Yes. Had never heard that particular one before. Period. Full stop. (...) Sounds like you had some family issues, either that or you put on a lot of airs... <grin, duck, run> (...) Oh, I grokked it, I just thought it picturesque speech... (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
       
            Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Tim Courtney
        "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GpK0LK.6FL@lugnet.com... (...) LOL. I think the pain of pinning the rose on one's nose would override the temporary odor relief the sweet smell of the rose would provide. ;-) (...) (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
      
           Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Paul Baulch
        "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:GpJJ4K.5Du@lugnet.com... (...) Tim, your efforts in attempting to reply to _every_ single statement that "tom" makes have earned you the title of Tireless Rebutter: (URL) go to bed. Or to (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Steve Runnels
       (...) Unfornently, NO, it's NOT! I don't know about you, but I prefer to hit that button once maybe twice to catch up on what I've missed. Now though, I find myself hitting the button 5 or 6 times. Granted that isn't a lot, but it all becomes very (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Jeff Stembel
      (...) Tim certainly can determine what he thinks is a quality MOC. He could have dropped the word "quality" and it would have been valid. (...) You're right, Tim doesn't have the right to determine what is allowed on Brickshelf. He DOES, however, (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Tom Inosanto
      <snipped alot of old convo> (...) Maybe to you, but does that mean it is valid in my eyes? Not saying it does not, but does it mean it applies across the board? No. (...) Yes he does, as do you. I never said you do not have that right. Can you show (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Steve Runnels
       (...) Calling us immature and telling us to "grow up" doesn't insinuate that you believe we have no right? Fine by me, believe what you will, but don't lie about it. (...) Too bad, you keep saying the same thing over and over. Obviously we don't see (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
     
          Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Jeff Stembel
      (...) I find that your statements to the effect that Jon is immature for suggesting it means you feel he is NOT within his rights. (...) You're not getting the point. We want a change in TOS. We realize they do belong, we want that to change. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Jeff Stembel
     (...) I can only imagine you are confusing my opinion on avatar images (and I include all avatar images, not just Bionicle ones) with my opinion on Bionicle MOCs. I have not bashed any Lego line in this thread, nor have I bashed any MOCs. Whether I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf —Christopher L. Weeks
   It seems that I might be stepping into a personality conflict between these two that pre-exists this discussion. Is that the case? (...) Too many capitalized words will dilute your point...whatever it was. (...) You go on to discuss how one makes (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR