Subject:
|
Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:47:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1149 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney writes:
> "tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpIFL7.MEB@lugnet.com...
>
> > If it is still there, then it is not being drowned out, its just being
> > joined. When you drown something out you overtake it and hide it from
> view.
>
> Quality MOCs are being overtaken on Brickshelf because of the avatars.
> They're not permanently hidden, but they're pushed out of the way (and
> hidden from view on the main Recent page) by an overwhelming number of these
> avatars.
I was unaware you were appointed to determine what is quality moc's and what
had a right to be on brickshelf.. And there is not an overwhelming amount of
these images, thats just you stretching the facts to gan points for you.
> > Nothing is being hidden from your view. It seems you are saying you are • too
> > lazy to pass these up and hit the 'next' button.
>
> Even if it were as simple as that, there's absolutely nothing wrong with him
> expressing an opinion and looking for backup. Jeff and Jon.
Agreed, but if you say that then you also must say there is nothing wrong
with what I am saying.
And it is as simple as hitting the 'next' button.
> > In his opinion they are ugly and whatever. But does that mean they should • be
> > banned. I personally do not like the 2001 racer sets - so does that mean
> > they should be banned?
>
> Is there a flood of Racer avatars? There's tons of things I don't like, I
> don't call for their banishment. Heck, there's a handful of *people* I
> don't like, and I don't call for theirs [1] without valid reason.
But he IS calling for them to be banned because he does notlike them!!! ANd
why - because he does not like them, and that is the only reason! Is that
valid? NO!
> There's a valid reason to call for the banishment of Bionicle avatars.
> There's a flood of them. And it seems that per one person there are many
> more than needed (I believe you only need one avatar for a perosnal icon).
> Jon (and now Jeff) are merely expressing opinions. If people agree, great!
> If not, that's fine too! Great thing about opinions is you don't have to
> share them.
There is no flood! There is more of a flood of the cad images than these
images, but you like cad images - so thats ok right? BOTH are lego related,
and BOTH have a place on Brickshelf, like it or not.
> > > Um, no. Asking for a ban IS expressing an opinion. If asking for a ban • is
> > > immature, isn't asking for something to NOT be banned, which is what • you're
> > > doing, just as immature?
> >
> > No, saying you do not like them is stating an opinion. Calling for
> > banishment is not an opinion.
>
> How is calling for banishment NOT an opinion? 'I think X should be banned,
> and here's why' certainly looks like an opinion to me. You certainly can't
> say that John and Jeff are calling for the banishment because of an
> objective fact.
>
> I think you're the one who has to grow up. Maybe learn to listen to others
> a bit and get out of your own little world.
Well if I am in my own little world I like it just fine, I do not try to ban
something because I do nto like it, I have the maturity to pass it over. And
I am listening to others, and I am disgusted at the 'I do not like this, so
lets ban it' talk. If you do not like it, thats your right - but that does
not mean you have to ban it.
tom
> -Tim
>
> [1] For the record, I have called for banishment a few times, but not
> without valid reason and the shared opinion of many others in the community.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
| "tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpJGnr.Ky4@lugnet.com... (...) news:GpIFL7.MEB@lugnet.com... (...) these (...) what (...) of (...) When did I say they didn't have a right to be on Brickshelf because of that? I was unaware I was (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
| (...) Unfornently, NO, it's NOT! I don't know about you, but I prefer to hit that button once maybe twice to catch up on what I've missed. Now though, I find myself hitting the button 5 or 6 times. Granted that isn't a lot, but it all becomes very (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
| "tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpIFL7.MEB@lugnet.com... (...) view. Quality MOCs are being overtaken on Brickshelf because of the avatars. They're not permanently hidden, but they're pushed out of the way (and hidden from view (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
