To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1476
1475  |  1477
Subject: 
Re: Photo Radar
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:34:59 GMT
Viewed: 
219 times
  
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 22:32:20 GMT, "James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com>
wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
Just a blatant troll for opinions...Around here there's a big squabble about
photo radar, and just this morning, someone in the office was grumbling about
getting a ticket, and everyone else was encouraging her to fight it.

Now, I'm wondering what the deal is?

You exceeded the legal speed limit.(cause)  You were caught.(cause)  You got
fined.(effect)

Is there some stunningly obvious factor that I'm missing, or are people just
whining?

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/

I have been the recipient of one of these tickets, and I have yet to hear
of any final outcome.

I recieved a letter in the mail with a picture of one of my vehicles,
showing the posted speed limit and the speed that the car was going. The
problem is that I was not the driver. The only reason that the ticket was
sent to me was than my name is the first one on the registration (my
wife's is the other).

Since I was not the one driving, I am supposed to turn over any information
about the person who was driving that I might have. I left all of these areas
blank, since the person driving *might* be a member of my immediate family
and I do not have to testify against them. I did however, submit a photocopy
of my drivers license and copies of the pictures taken so they could see just
how mistaken they were. (At this time I had a full beard and short hair,
where the person driving was a female and had long hair).

Hmm.  Maybe it's different in the States, but here, if you are the registered
owner of a vehicle, then you are responsible for that vehicle.(1)  If someone
else is driving it, they are driving it either:
a) with your permission, either implicit or explicit, or
b) without your permission.

In the case of A, it is your responsibility to determine who was driving at the
time, and ensure that they make reparations to you, and that if they use your
vehicle in the future, they do so in a safe manner.

In the case of B, report your vehicle as stolen, and (if you know the guilty
party) charge them.

Whatever happend to innocent until proven guilty?

It isn't a matter of innocent until proven guilty.  They have a picture of a
vehicle registered to you that was recorded in a breach of the law.  They have
made a logical conclusion, and sent you a ticket which informs you of the fine
for the breach, and (here, at least) a court date for the issue to be resolved,
if necessary.

My point is more of a responsibility gripe than a legal question. (and pushes
my opinion of people even farther into cynicism)  If you were speeding, and you
got caught, then pay the fine.  It's as simple as that.

Don't know about other localities, but here (Phoenix AZ), if you get a
photo-radar ticket, the drivers face *must* be clearly visible.  If it is
obscured, they will not process the ticket.  So, when driving though
photo-radar country, keep the sun visor down.(1)

Or better yet, slow down.  :-)

-- Terry K --
1. Just joking!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Photo Radar
 
(...) Both good and valid points. My point is that it was *possibly* a family member who was driving the vehicle, and I am not required to testify against them. If they determine which family member *might* have been driving then I would gladly pay (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Photo Radar
 
(...) Hmm. Maybe it's different in the States, but here, if you are the registered owner of a vehicle, then you are responsible for that vehicle.(1) If someone else is driving it, they are driving it either: a) with your permission, either implicit (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

15 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR