Debate : 12571


Off-Topic / Debate / 12571	12570 \| 12572

Subject:	Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2001 22:43:40 GMT
Viewed:	35 times

In lugnet.loc.pt, Pedro Silva writes: > There is a catch, though: The earthquake. It was 5 years after the writer's > passing out (out/away/?)... Surely you realize that San Francisco has had earthquakes before 1989? Also, technically the 1989 quake wasn't centered in San Francisco, but in Loma Prieta, certainly close enough to be felt. http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/large_usa.html He could have been referring to the 1906 quake, the largest recorded one ever in San Francisco.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done)
(...) Sure, I realize that. And discarded that chance. In 1906 WHO ON EARTH could have responded to tha SF earthquake with help (in useful time, that is)??? If he was talking about that quake, he is far more innocent than I thought... Besides, was (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done)
In lugnet.loc.pt, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes: (snipped) (...) Eh eh, I wrote just about the same concerning Airbus (I did not read your post until i posted mine...). There is a catch, though: The earthquake. It was 5 years after the writer's (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

22 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search