Subject:
|
Re: What makes a cool kid cool? (was: Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 May 2001 02:20:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
797 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Tim Courtney writes:
> [...] Don't you think that those owners suffer poor self esteem
> because they never get nominated CLSOTW?
I think it must happen some, yes, and that's a probably a downside. CLSotW
isn't specifically marketed at masses of kids, though, so I'm not too
worried.
> [...]
> I see a surprising similarity between this article - in which I wholeheartedly
> agree with the author - and the ideas presented here about the negative impact a
> section 'Cool Kids' will have on every kid not mentioned's self esteem.
The competitive nature of the area is there regardless of the name. I don't
have any problem with that. I'm just saying I think the _name_ is poorly
chosen...and I don't think LEGO consulted with child psychologists before
picking the name. That upsets me more than I'd like to admit it does.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
71 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|