Subject:
|
Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 May 2001 19:30:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1188 times
|
| |
|
|
"Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Tomas Clark writes:
> > Protective undergarments notwithstanding, I have just checked on Netscape
> > 4.75 for Linux (pretty darn close to what Chris was using), and the same bug
> > is present. If you turn off Javascript you also turn off stylesheets, even
> > if it looks like stylesheets are checked... So Chris, in that particular
> > browser you'll have to turn on Javascript as well if you want to use
> > stylesheets and view legible Build pages -- at least until we can patch in
> > the no-stylesheets fix.
>
> I'd vote for a no-javascript fix. Until Lego's website is viewable without
> it, you're alienating people who don't have Javascript due to platform or
> security issues.
>
> Whatever happened to plain old regular HTML, anyway?
It's dead. Web sites that just use plain HTML without JS or
animations or other glitz are just not "cool" enough.
I agree with you, don't get me wrong. But the reality is that the
vast majority of Web users these days are using M$ Internet Exploiter
and don't have the foggiest idea what risks they might be running.
I'm fairly sure however that JavaScript's security holes were fixed
years ago, and any modern version of NS or IE should offer very little
risk with JS turned on. ActiveX, on the other hand ... *shudder*
--Bill.
--
William R Ward hermit@bayview.com http://www.bayview.com/~hermit/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."-Groucho Marx
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
| (...) Well, www.lego.com has been "too cool" for me since virtually day one anyway, so if its webdesigners can't figure out these issues, it'd be no big loss if I can never access content on it. LUGNET is *much* more friendly (and more human IMO) (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
| (...) I'd vote for a no-javascript fix. Until Lego's website is viewable without it, you're alienating people who don't have Javascript due to platform or security issues. Whatever happened to plain old regular HTML, anyway? Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
71 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
