Debate : 10405


Off-Topic / Debate / 10405	10404 \| 10406

Subject:	Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2001 05:50:07 GMT
Viewed:	729 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: > The logistics of a conventional invasion of the U.S. are quite beyond > virtually any nation. Paranoia scenarios like "Red Dawn" always amuse me. Hah! Classic 80's Cold War paranoia, with Patrick Swayze to boot! The sad thing is that paranoia helps sell weapons. I have no doubt that our country makes enemies when none are there just to validate military spending. I looked back at one LUGNETer's post talking about a space-based weapons platform to protect America from Iraqi Scuds. Reality or paranoia? Dan

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) Neither, because that's not what the post said. At least not any that I saw, anyway. Feel free to provide the link back to the post to correct me. To reopen. It is my firm belief that a space based weapons platform can stop long and even (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) Ahhhh, spin control. Phillip Morris' wet-dream scenario! :-) (...) Listen to advertising: "An independent research firm confirms our product is the best..." They don't tell you who paid for the research to be done, which is often the entity (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search