 | | Re: Common ground in science/Bible debate
|
|
(...) I would disagree with this. There are basically a handfull of major world religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam - and some of these are sometimes considered more philosophies than religions). (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | A washed-out Robert (Was: Robert gets to invalidate logic)
|
|
(...) Wow, cool, thanks Brother Lar. Keep the flattery up, you might make a Larritarian out of me yet! ;-) I'm noticing (and I'm sure it's been observed before) that these kind of noisemakers come in cycles, but only last a short time. Burn brightly (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) So why you just don't cut your holly book into two slices, and put your intellect between them and shove it all together to your holly hole, instead just losing your holly time here? If you want to debate, than debate till the end, if you (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) Even awake for that matter, I suspect, as comprehending gibberish that has no underlying meaning is a bit beyond Sproat's prowess. I've got one of those gibberish generators too, though, so producing text that is incomprehensible isn't much of (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) Heh..heh..heheheh.he...e...heheh. Selçuk (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Toys used to be so much better
|
|
(...) I feel your pain. I was lamenting much the same thing when I was at TRU last week. However.... (...) Look here: (URL) plans to release these transformers in the USA this fall, accompanied by a cartoon. Here's a news link: (URL) is also a (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert: Just another Troll
|
|
(...) Hahaha. You got ever worse - where's this cleverness you keep gloating about? A Mystic 8-Ball has better comebacks. Concentrate and ask again. (...) I think I missed that same meeting - why are you flaming *everyone*? I'm for one sick of it. (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Common ground in science/Bible debate
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Robert Bevens writes: I guess basically it'd be like as soon as (...) I think if you we're a god you'd only do everything in an infinite number of combinations ONCE! I doubt even a god could do everthing in every (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Can I bring up Lego in off-topic? :-)
|
|
With Robert Bevens making such an impact on this newsgroup I came to wonder whether he's actually any good with Lego. A few minutes detective work tells me he rarely posts anyware but off-topic. He only seems to have appeared a month ago (and is (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Toys used to be so much better
|
|
I feel sorry for todays kids, not only have lego sets become less interesting and more childish, toys in general arn't as good. Where are the classics available during my childhood. Decent transformers that turn into cars, not the stupid bugs that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Common ground in science/Bible debate
|
|
(...) You keep talking like that and Zeus is gonna come down here and make us all sorry! (...) And pizza helps relieve the HUNGER in our existence. (...) Here's an interesting thought, if God were really a God, as in if he had total and absolute (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Common ground in science/Bible debate
|
|
Greetings! I've been following the debate regarding science and the Bible and it seems the debate has digressed so I thought I'd start a thread about the things I think we should agree on. Feel free to join in but please keep an open mind and use (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) Well your lame was pretty pathetic. You shouldn't expect any more than you're willing to give out yourself. (...) I think maybe I missed a meeting, I didn't know we were flaming against one another. If that was the case I probably would have (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) I have not even BEGUN to inflate my ego! I can produce devastating walls of text in my sleep the likes of your puny brain has yet to comprehend! `, Þ Robert (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic
|
|
(...) Again simply accusing me of being equivocal, but this time doing it in a rather prolix over exasperated way, as if that somehow makes it any less transparent and laughable. In case you hadn't noticed I'm still "holding" the position I started (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) That's a pretty pathetic comeback. I thought you said you are clever - I'd figure you'd use something good for a stock phrase. I'm not impressed. (...) Oh, I'm sorry - you keep telling me how clever you are. I thought you could figure it out. (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) Well, we can't... but we CAN spotlight stuff we agree with. You got my vote on this one, Brother Sproat. ++Lar (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic
|
|
(...) Trying to find equivocation in your arguments is like trying to find grass in a meadow. I don't have all that much experience on Usenet, as you so proudly proclaim yourself to have, but your style of argument (about which, see below) was old (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) Indeed it has. You might want to parcel it out a bit cautiously, as it would be a shame to run out of it too soon. ++Lar (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
|
(...) It's times like this when I wish we could score articles as "Troll" and "Obvious ego autoflagellation" like on Slashdot... :-P Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
