To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9886
9885  |  9887
Subject: 
Re: Common ground in science/Bible debate
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 7 Apr 2001 08:19:20 GMT
Reply-To: 
Q_HARLEQUIN_P@HOTMAIL.COMstopspam
Viewed: 
123 times
  
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001 07:44:39 GMT, "Daniel Jassim"
<danieljassim@hotmail.com> wrote:

Greetings! I've been following the debate regarding science and the Bible
and it seems the debate has digressed so I thought I'd start a thread about
the things I think we should agree on. Feel free to join in but please keep
an open mind and use kind words.

We should agree that Christianity is one of thousands of religions practiced
by the billions that inhabit this planet. There are even faiths still
practiced today that have been around before Moses. There are other faiths,
like those of the ancient Greeks, that are no longer practiced.

You keep talking like that and Zeus is gonna come down here and make
us all sorry!

Each religion has it's laws, beliefs and stories. Some have written works
while others are handed down orally. Each religion has it's own story of
creation. The stories in the Bible are just as relevant to Christians as
were the Greek's stories of the gods of Olympus, which we now call myths.

Science reveals the FACTS of our existence while religion helps reveal the
MEANING of our existence.

And pizza helps relieve the HUNGER in our existence.

The theory of evolution is a conclusive scientific explanation for fossil
and living evidence of plant and animal adaptation over time. Creation
stories are non-scientific and involve a supernatural being(s) or force that
willfully builds the world and the life to inhabit it.

Here's an interesting thought, if God were really a God, as in if he
had total and absolute power, why would he exist?  I mean if you're a
true God shouldn't you be able to experience everything there is to
experience in the whole universe, in an infinite number of way, and an
infinite number of times, and shouldn't you be able to do all that
instantly?  I mean...at that point, isn't the only thing left to
experience, non existence?  I guess basically it'd be like as soon as
you become a God, you would instantly destroy yourself, simply because
it's the only thing left to do that you haven't already done an
infinite number of times already.

I think that these are the main points we can agree on, if you have others,
please add.

Diet Dr. Pepper tastes more like regular Dr. Pepper.

Robert



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Common ground in science/Bible debate
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Robert Bevens writes: I guess basically it'd be like as soon as (...) I think if you we're a god you'd only do everything in an infinite number of combinations ONCE! I doubt even a god could do everthing in every (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Common ground in science/Bible debate
 
Greetings! I've been following the debate regarding science and the Bible and it seems the debate has digressed so I thought I'd start a thread about the things I think we should agree on. Feel free to join in but please keep an open mind and use (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR