To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *6626 (-10)
  J.W. (Was Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
 
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) crap (...) J.W. - Would you, perchance, be referring to one Jonathan Wilson? If so, then while we're on the subject of unrepentant rudeness, would someone please care to direct me to the public apology made (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: My point.
 
(...) alt.usenet.kooks? (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My point.
 
(...) Matthew's posting privileges are now disabled (to all groups) after the past round of abusive messages he posted. Lord knows if he's the same person who identified himself/herself at "Madhatter" in RTL last year, but there's been plenty enough (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My point.
 
(...) Matthew, darlin, get a grip. I'm sorry, but you do realize that it was *obviously* not just what you said to Jude that got everyone here riled up. You said yourself that you made up that whole discussion on your site. That it's not your (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: This sums it up
 
Just my two bits ..... A while back, I taught metaphysics class on AOL( yea yea lame but I had to start somewhere <G>) anyway, these chat rooms are open to the aol public and folks would take it upon themselves to stop in and disrupt the class to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: My point.
 
(...) It's not always important that everyone agrees with you, you've just got to be careful about whether the really important people disagree with you. Like the police for instance. (...) Seems awfully strange to mention the police at a time like (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: This sums it up
 
Ok, It started with "this site sucks" From Matt Then "rude" Then "...this site would interest me if I were a 6 year old" From Matt And "...idolizing James Jassim as a god" From Matt Then "...provided you grow up" So on and so fourth.... Nastier and (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: My point.
 
(...) Actually, the incident I was referring to above wasn't you -- it was someone else. But anyway... (...) I don't think I participated in that discussion. I pretty much stopped posting to RTL after 1998. I do remember reading parts of it, though. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Sad state of affairs
 
Matthew wrote in message <39ed018c.2602594@ne...et.com>... (...) Matthew, you seem to be unaware of one of golden rules of human life: APOLOGISE FOR BEING RUDE. You aren't being shunned for being rude. You are being shunned for being rude and being (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR