 | | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) Not by libertarians, it's not. We reject the one dimensional spectrum. You need at least two. See the quiz at www.lp.org, for example. (...) Again, not enough dimensions in use to be accurate. ++Lar (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
Hi, (...) It's not really a matter of right/left seeing it that way, but of "old-school/new-school" and how polarized a particular speaker is. Of course, a lot of the "new school" people are deconstructionists and think that trying to diagram (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) history (...) Both the far right and left merge under totalitarianism. I came to this conclusion independently many years ago, so it seems to be fairly self-evident once you get into it. My experience is that conservatives are the ones who see (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
Lindsay, (...) time. (...) I went (...) council in (...) shot by (...) that (...) with (...) like (...) Hmm... well, I guess my political philosophy is definately right / conservative (Which, in actuality, classic liberal) / Budding Libertarian. My (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) Everyone has different reasons for embracing a given philosophy--a fellow I went to college with (actually, he was a Lib candidate for Ypsilanti city council in the early 1990s) apparently switched from Dem to Lib to Rep (after being shot by a (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
Steve, (...) True in facts, but facts rarely enter in political debates most of the time. (...) Wow, this is the first time I heard someone mention this, I always thought the same. Fascism / Marxism / Communism is not too fr off in my book. I think (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) Libertarianism is generally considered to be strongly toward the right of the political spectrum. Not at the end, of course: there is no end. The 'political spectrum' is not a line, but a circle, with the far left colliding with the far right. (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) The amusing thing being that Ronny took a paper loss that year and didn't pay income tax (which the papers had a field day with in California and why it sticks in my mind). Bruce (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
Larry, Very interesting, conservatism is close to Libertarian views? Hmm... sounds familiar. : ) ( Outside of all that Christian Right rubbish, which, for the most part, I do not agree with ) Seriously, though, very interesting interview. I keep (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) I recall that quote, actually, and I agree with it, by the way. ++Lar (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) ideas (...) his (...) "Taxes should hurt" -Ronald Reagan (quote while he was governor of California) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
This is from a 1975 interview I dug up. It's eerie, how fresh some of the ideas still sound to me. This was from when he was governor of California, before his 1976 run against Gerald R. Ford. (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Insider Trading (Was: Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!))
|
|
Hello Richard: There is more to this than just manipulating stock prices. Existing and new shareholders have to have some comfort that they are been treated equitably and have confidence in the stock market. Capital stock markets are one of the ways (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
(...) That is a good point, i will have to ask the legal dept about this, i will let everybody know the results And i hope i will be able to do it -- Michael - - - Please reply on medwards@ukonline.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
Michael Edwards <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:Fs8EnD.IDE@lugnet.com... (...) lot (...) Yes, but the Adventurers mag is not published by LEGO so copyright will be held by someone else. Huw (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
I have the fax from Lego which gives me permission to display any images from Lego, which includeds Magazines, Adverts, Comic strips, Manuals the lot really. -- Michael - - - Please reply on medwards@ukonline.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
<agreed> (...) the (...) Agreed, it is one thing to post a individual page from a mag, it is another to start scanning a whole series of magazines - especially ones which are quite recent. Scott A (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) "Geeting the irrits" roughly translates to "my fingers are getting numb from too much typing and couldn't keep up with my brain, and my brain failed to register the typo". "Getting the irrits", well, I hope that clears it up. Pete Callaway (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: This new subject doesn't reset the thread (Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
I'm redirecting this discussion to lugnet.off-topic.debate where I should have set follow-ups in the first place... (I think my original note was perhaps appropriate for admin, but the discussion is going to most likely be of the debate kind of (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | FUT OTD {Was: Re: This new subject doesn't reset the thread)
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
