To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *41 (-20)
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
I heard that there is a college trying to get grant money to try it out in zero-g sorry don't remember much about it most of it was related to me from my cousin. Scary thing is that they might get it. Jesse Long wrote in message ... (...) 8-) (...) (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Test
 
(...) No it's not. (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  TEST
 
This is just a test. (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Test
 
THIS IS JUST A TEST. (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
Ardjan Besse wrote in message <361e1892.24643415@l...et.com>... (...) Is that possible in zero-g? I've read that it's impossible in freefall, unless you get a head start before you jump out of the plane. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist (...) (26 years ago, 9-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Special Boxes
 
(...) Failure of the spell checker, despite being set to British English......... ___...___ richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam dot Web Sight: (URL) Instant Messenger: RJD88888 ICQ 13177071 ___...___ For the best Lego news, visit: (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 9-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Special Boxes
 
(...) ago. Presumably you are referring to that silly Channel 4 documentary, "Search for the Lost Civilization?" Unfortunately, I missed the 3rd episode, went to see your favourite film, "Saving Private Ryan," instead! BTW it was a fantastic film, (...) (26 years ago, 9-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
Op een zekere dag, te weten Thu, 8 Oct 1998 22:02:58 GMT, klom cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) in het toetsenbord en schreef ons: (...) Well, as far as I know, they once tried to make a family in the Mir.... 8-) That can be a fun thing to do, (...) (26 years ago, 9-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
(...) Maybe not stupid, but have you ever heard of the ABM treaty? I believe the gist of it is that it prohibits Anti-Ballistic Missile defenses. AFAIK, we respected that treaty, even thought the Soviets did not. -- Terry K -- -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Special Boxes
 
Simon Denscombe wrote in message ... (...) ago. (...) As a Brit how can you not spell civilization with a z? I thought you used z's all over the place. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Special Boxes
 
(...) But there is evidence to suggest that Civilisation started 13,000 years ago. ;-) Carbon 60 ======== Posted via the LUGNET discussion group web interface ======== (URL) Search, Read, Post, or Watch Traffic (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
(...) ^^^^^ I was skimming this, paying more attention to trying to stay awake than fully read it. So I read that as "the first man in space, the first woman, the first dog, ..." and I thought, "wow, the Russians put a whole family in space. Add a (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
Op een zekere dag, te weten Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:07:16 GMT, klom "Matt Marshall" <Matt@rapturesoft.hy...rmart.net> in het toetsenbord en schreef ons: (...) Don't underestimate the Russians! They where the first to take a sattelite into space, the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
(...) Imagine weather-based coded launch sequences...... Launch software searches the 'net for predicted, specific weather patterns in a designated target area, i.e. west coast USA....... When, say, 80% of the region expects easterly winds, and (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) It wouldn't be unimportant, sure the Ecological impacts would be horrible, but hey, most silos that I know of aren't exactly near town, and Nuclear weapons are only cumulative to a point, other than that they (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
(...) Yes. Joke. No smiley because I try not to laugh at my own jokes, as that's usually considered poor form. (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
(...) I trust this is what is called a Joke? Because I don't think this should be necessary at all. Sarah sarah@eskimo.com (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Special Boxes
 
(...) I do like option "c." Even better if it was timer set......... ___...___ richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam dot Web Sight: (URL) Instant Messenger: RJD88888 ICQ 13177071 ___...___ (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
(...) So you're not saying that they couldn't have nailed us, you're just saying that they could have only nailed missile silos. I guess you'd consider any number of nuclear explosions over missile silos and the damage that would cause to the (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
Matt Marshall wrote in message ... (...) Missile (...) caused (...) 1)The Russians first wave was targeted at the Silos not at the prez because he would be long gone and they knew that 2)They had to fly a really long way, except from the Siberian (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR