 | | Re: Back to the Real Wasteland of the mind
|
|
(...) 8^( No, alas. I guess it would have been more precise to say "legitimately" instead of "simply." Dave! (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Back to the Real Wasteland of the mind
|
|
(...) Wanna bet? Chris (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
(...) Not surprisingly, Dubya is still (URL) clinging> to his "admit no error policy." Here are a few lies of omission worth noting: "This administration never said that the 9-11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al-Qaida," he said. Even (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Back to the Real Wasteland of the mind
|
|
(...) You're blurring the issue. The Bush administration made and continues to make claims and accusations regarding the "known" ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda, and those claims were used to justify the war that has resulted in over 800 American (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Pat Buchanan & Ralph Nader
|
|
Not exactly two people you'd expect to be getting along so well. (URL) interesting interview whether you agree or disagree with either or both ... (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | freeper stuff
|
|
(...) In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Parsons wrote: (...) Whatever. I simply dug up the link because Dave's original post mentioned it and then immediately dismissed it with a somewhat misleading comment. With that link you and others are now (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Back to the Real Wasteland of the mind
|
|
(...) All media is biased in some way. And you're right, it's a problem that folks like yourself can't seem to see that. Anyhow, the point that I seem unable to make is that simply reprinting it adds nothing. It merely serves as propaganda. No doubt (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Back to the Real Wasteland of the mind
|
|
(...) Hard to see this as simply counter-spin. Indeed, its a bit light on for spin at all. It is a grave concern when folks can't seperate the spin from the facts. Its like treating the various newspapers in Don's other post (which for the most part (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Freeper stuff
|
|
(...) Hey thanks, I never heard of a freeper before, but google has. Here's the top link from a list on the yipping ground. (URL) it does point to a freeper page, the page itself contains many quotes from various international newspapers. Are you (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
(...) I saw that report on CNN on the "Politics" page and right on the side bar was another 'report' stating that Dubya still believes the link was there. I was also at the Freepers yipping ground today and one guy had a whole list of links to (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
Like, oh wauw, haven't hear that already 2 years ago... So, no evidence of WoMD in 3, 2, 1... Oh well, always handy to control oil supplies to Russia and China isn't it. Jeroen "Scott A" <dr_scott_arthur@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Back to the Real Waste
|
|
(...) snip Yes, that is exactly what you're doing. You failed to provide even a paragraph of your own valuable insight. No need to be so lazy. We all know you can do better than that. (20 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
(URL) 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda> How does one engage a special prosecutor? Scott A (20 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Once again, the Supreme Court proves to be gutless
|
|
(...) I'm an atheist. I refused to speak the pledge throughout my school years. I was beaten and ridiculed by my peers while the teachers pretended not to notice because of my stance. I oppose the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance because that (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Real Waste
|
|
(...) People say things like that occasionally, but I don't think it's an endemic view. I know a few professors and they're all quite underpaid -- by which I mean they could be working in the private sector and making twice as much or more for (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: "free" at the point of delivery
|
|
(...) I have the impression that in nations with a richer socialist tradition (like the UK), it is much more acceptable to accept from the public coffers the kind of aid that's being discussed here and in turn, to take seriously the responsibility (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "free" at the point of delivery
|
|
(...) Either you're extremely sensitive about this, or you must've missed the winky. That was intended to be an absurd example to bring something you said earlier (and eventually snipped) into perspective. But if you wish, I suppose you could (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "free" at the point of delivery
|
|
(...) 2 Points then: 1. What experience do you have of Universities outside the USA? 2. What makes you think "professors" are "overpaid"? (...) First you will have to show me that "free" education produces "idealists with no concept of the real (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Been Google Bombing???
|
|
(...) See: (URL) A (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Once again, the Supreme Court proves to be gutless
|
|
(...) I cringe. Bruce (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
