 | | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) Man, can't you go one thread without referring to Kelsey Grammer? 8^) Dave! (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) *Bam!* And down goes Fraser! Dave K -in the parlance of all the net-philes, "Dubya pwned!" or "Scott A>Dubya" -Take 2--fixing a plethora of problems, least of which is the FTX :) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) And sown goes Fraser! Dave K -in the parlance of all the net-philes, "Dubya pwned!" or "Scott A>Dubya" (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) Note: The term "re-elected" implies he has already been elected. ;) Scott A (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Marchetti wrote: (snip) (...) "Letter of the TOS"? Really. Tell me how exactly your post is anywhere near on topic for .admin. Grow up. JOHN (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I completely agree he was rabble rousing and fully aware of it. Also arguably as egregious with its "in your face" attitude was his flaunting the fact that he was posting with a dead email address and not providing a good one. But I saw no (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I would vigorously dispute that. In fact I already have, and the person I disputed them with was satisfied that what I was getting at was that Richard acknowledge that he erred, acknowledge that he doesn't get a pass because he's an Angry (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) Hop Frog cannot answer you because he has been banned. BTW, about the ban... what I would have suggested is a blanket ban with a definite time frame. He obviously posted knowing full well he was in violation of the TOS so a ban is in order. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (was Re: Bush is almost as much of an idiot as is John Neal)
|
|
(...) Well, Hop-Frog, we may be enemys on the .Castle front, but-- Wow. Incredible speach. Bravo, thrice over! alex (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) Its about getting George W. Bush re-elected. Duh- didnt everybody know that the war was just so that Mr. Bush could get in some good photos of him acting like a little smarty by landing on an aircraft carrier? I mean, if Iraq was of no threat (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
From: (URL) US fires Guantanamo defence team> "The first day, when they were being briefed on the dos and don'ts, at least a couple said: 'You can't impose these restrictions on us because we can't properly represent our clients.' "When the group (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A sincere question about the Bible
|
|
orrex@excite.com (Dave Schuler) wrote in <Hopn0o.1M3y@lugnet.com>: (...) Yep, it's mostly implicit. Apart from the stuff John mentioned, there are some places where it's pretty clear, like in this combination: 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slow in (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | "Americans Exaggerated Battle Death Toll"
|
|
From today's (URL) Scotsman>: "Many residents said the Americans opened fire at random when they came under attack, and targeted civilian installations.Six destroyed vehicles sat in front of the hospital, where witnesses said US tanks shelled people (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shopoholic stampede
|
|
(...) Before this type of thing usually happened iduring 'christmas sales' like the 'tickle me elmo' idiocy that happened a few years back... Now it looks like this sort of thing happens everywhere and at any time--'look out! It's an 'every person (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Shopoholic stampede
|
|
This BBC article angered me: (URL) lined up trample a woman over a sale on DVD players. Only the woman's sister and a store employee come to her aid. But, to add insult to injury, after that ordeal, the company offers to put an item on hold for her, (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | More on Diebold and voting fraud
|
|
(URL) has some new information. Everything blue in the article is a link to somewhere else. Apparently some of the sourcecode for these voting machines has been purloined, posted in multiple places, and examined by purported experts who claim that (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
|
(...) Where did I say that? I can think of a host of things I'd like to see added (and have made suggestions about them in the past) and I would in no way equate my saying "I'm not someone that says that a private service has to accomodate all (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
|
(...) Who said that? I'm not seeing that in this thread, although the thread (and other related ones) has some aspects of "usenet is better because it is free" koolaid drinking to it. So it may be that there's some rigidity present, yes... just not (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
|
(...) I give up. Maybe you're right. I just thought I'd make a suggestion that could possibly make lugnet better. Who knew I was straying into debate territory. Let's everyone chant together. Lugnet is perfect! Lugnet is perfect! Change is bad... (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Message awaiting authentication
|
|
(...) Actually, that's what I was hoping for when I asked the question. For Todd to think about it for a few seconds and then decide if there was possibly a way to make an improvement to lugnet without a whole lot of effort. Instead I got you, (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
