 | | Re: God's Nature
|
|
You're so far gone, there is no way to reply to that. No matter what I might state next you will insist that you can "interpret" the Bible in such a way as to reveal either an error in it, or in my interpretation of it. Everyone get that? The Bible (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | God's Nature
|
|
(...) You are kidding, right? (...) Hmmm. So you are telling me that you know that exact nature of God? (...) That they perceived God was and whether God actually was are 2 very different things. (...) What are you implying here? That you understand (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
|
(...) You confuse me. What is the difference? (...) Again you confuse me. Superior in what way? (...) Again with the confusion. Laws just don't pop up out of thin air. They are based on the morality and sensibility of a given society or culture. (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush AWOL
|
|
(...) When you combine this with (URL) you get part of MAD magazine's article: MAD's Deck of 52 least wanted Americans. One of which is the 2004 Democratic presidental nominee: Whether it be Al, Bob, Joe, or Rick, you want a loser take your pick. (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Bush AWOL
|
|
(7 URLs) What can I add to our national disgrace? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: More Laws than You Can Shake a Stick At
|
|
(...) Lenny, Christians would point to passages such as this from Mark 14: 61Again the high priest asked him, "Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?" 62"I am," said Jesus. "And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Imperiled!
|
|
(...) Thanks ROSCO. That brought a smile. Go git 'em, boys! Dave K -"I'm laughing at the superior intellect"--Adm JTK, ST:TWOK (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
(...) Well, your clothing won't get you there as fast, but if you wear the bullet train, you'll probably be overdressed. Dave! (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
(...) Apparently so, Dave! (...) Sure, Dave! ALL you have to do is let me get the last word, Dave! That's really not so hard, you know, Dave! (speaking of debates (internal in this case), I'm torn between taking the bullet train or taking more (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
(...) I don't care enough to research the full breadth of Ms. Nagorka's work (which I likewise find disappointingly pedestrian), but the passage you cite strikes me as a critique by Debs & Co. rather than a formal declaration of intent by the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Imperiled!
|
|
(...) Sometimes the sarcastic remark, intended to mock when uttered by the speaker, actually contains the germ of the truth. If the legitimacy of our election process is imperiled as greviously as these articles allege (and it's pretty scary stuff, (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
For some other perspectives on this: (URL) Clean up Sculpture on Aisle 9!> (these include people who purport to work for HD, and people who purport to be the gallery owner I cited in my last post, and a bunch of other voices) This has been an (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Another Poetry Hit 'n' Run (was Re: Imperiled!)
|
|
(...) Yeah, too bad people won't actually wake up, they just go to movies with that as the central theme. Intellectually and emotionally inoculated against resistance, they can continue on the heavy dose of soma... ~~~...~~~ Wake Up by Rage Against (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
(...) From (URL) (one of the links given in the article): " Ms. Nagorka's use of Home Depot as off-site site underscores an element of social critique present in the work: which is more suitable as a matrix within which to make works of art, the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Imperiled!
|
|
(...) Oh well, if you can't fight the corporations with your vote, at least y'all have your guns, right? ROSCO (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Imperiled!
|
|
All the President's Votes? (URL) A Quiet Revolution is Taking Place in US Politics. By the Time It's Over, the Integrity of Elections Will be in the Unchallenged, Unscrutinized Control of a Few Large - and Pro-Republican - Corporations. Andrew (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
(...) It seemed stunningly obvious to me that in large part you decided that the artist and NPR were indulging in some sort of anti-corporate crusade in regards to this particular case, evidence that I simply did not see. You've repeated the charge (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
(...) Take your time with a response, if any. LEGOWORLD understandably takes precedence over OT ruminations... (...) The bogging appears to focus on *how wrong* her act was/is, rather than on whether or not it is wrong in some absolute sense. To (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
(...) I am pressed for time, lots of LEGOWORLD prep I gotta do, so... briefly... (if such is possible) The original post I made sort of took as a given (because it was stunningly obvious to me, anyway) that what she's doing is morally wrong, and was (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
|
(...) I can't comment on Mr. Schlkbrnd's patronage, but I think you've otherwise made your strongest point. If she's making a profit at HD's expense, then HD is within its rights to try to recoup its share of that profit (and that's in addition to (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
