Subject:
|
Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:44:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
540 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > The original post I made sort of took as a given (because it was stunningly
> > obvious to me, anyway) that what she's doing is morally wrong, and was talking
> > about the fact that NPR didn't even touch on that in its puff piece (review the
> > subject line, it does try to show what I'm getting at...).
>
> It seemed stunningly obvious to me that in large part you decided that the
> artist and NPR were indulging in some sort of anti-corporate crusade in regards
> to this particular case, evidence that I simply did not see. You've repeated
> the charge numerous times, but I still don't see the evidence of such.
From http://www.debsandco.com/nagorka.html (one of the links given in the
article):
" Ms. Nagorka's use of Home Depot as off-site site underscores an element of
social critique present in the work: which is more suitable as a matrix within
which to make works of art, the sublime "emptiness" of wilderness or the
relentless "cultivation" of suburban New Jersey? "
Seems obvious enough to me right there, but YMMV.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
