Subject:
|
Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:24:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
399 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> And as a most minor among minor shareholders my opinion doesn't count for much.
> (to management, speaking as a shareholder). However (since this tiny thing is
> veering off in many different directions) would you agree or disagree with the
> assertion that major corps more often than not seem to be run more for the
> benefit of management than for the benefit of the stockholders? That's properly
> the topic of another thread, but I've said before I think big corps have too
> much power today, power which the Founders didn't intend, and I'd reintroduce
> personal liability and make other changes to dilute their power.
how about companies that are run for the benefit of the stock/shareholders to
the detriment of service to the customer? This is endemic in companies that
supply services to the public sector, especially where the service was
previously 'in-house' examples of this are common on the railways in the uk.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|