 | | Re: Git outta my bedroom!!
|
|
(...) Aren't the courts supposed to be a part of the gov't? There is a process. (...) Ah, so you are a unisex restroom proponent then. (...) Bigot! I and my 4 female lovers and 1 male lover are being discriminated against! Who says it's only between (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Git outta my bedroom!!
|
|
(...) Someone has to lead... and if it's not the gov't *and* the courts, than who? Further, *any* law that excludes a person due to his or her sex is sexual discrimination--we're not talking changing the number of people in a marriage--marriage is (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Git outta my bedroom!!
|
|
(...) The institution of marriage is devalued, and here is how. If you allow same-sex marriages (remember, this isn't a ban on homosexual marriages), then you open pandora's box WRT to marriage. What about three people who want to get married? How (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New vs. Old
|
|
(...) This makes interesting imagery :) I can see a lot of people chewing on some 2 x 2 bricks right now. -Anne -- Conformity: Proudly (\`--/') _ _______ .-r-. serving painfully boring >.~.\ `` ` `,`,`. ,'_'~`. people since time began. (v_," ; `,-\ (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) À la Unabomber? Or McVeigh? Or that guy in Ruby Ridge? Or David Khoresh? Or 'Michigan Militia'? Or?... (...) What do you base this assertion on? (Really, I'm curious about it) (...) "Most". Is that comparison valid towards Canada? :-) (...) (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Git outta my bedroom!!
|
|
(URL) this is a thing about Canada... so don't worry 'bout it... " It dismisses what it sees as the government's "ridiculous argument" that it needs to go slow in framing any legal changes because there is no "consensus" in Canada. "All Canadians (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) What can I say? You set yourself up for the obvious. It needed to be said to draw you off your high horse, but you if you wish to remount... :-) (...) If we continue to pass judgment on it, then the document remains living, not simply a 200 (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) You say that like it's a bad thing. But no, I am not, the NRA are misguided, they miss the point when they talk about hunting and home defense. The point is right there in the 2nd amendment. (...) Funny, I often think the same thing when (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) Then John's right, it IS specious, used in this context. You can't lay 70 years of building up an underclass via income transfer, 50 years of futile drug warfare and increased loss of liberties, 40 years of failed social engineering, 30 years (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) The comparison was between leaders, not countries. (...) I think it's bothersome, and hence I pointed it out. (...) I've heard that, but don't know from whom it came. (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) Oh I love it when people say that others don't understand... throw the argeuement into question by alluding to ignorance or incompotence... nicely done. I'm well aware of the evolution of the laws. I'm also aware of the ability to strike and (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) How so? I don't happen to agree with the conclusion being drawn, or at least implied, (that we are either as bad or almost as bad as DPRK... as if!) but the large number of incarcerations among the underclass strikes me as a sign of oppression (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Melting a planet's core
|
|
"Steven lane" <steveroblane@aol.com> wrote in message news:HG9vo5.1099@lugnet.com... (...) it's (...) deflected (...) lost (...) of the (...) planet and (...) moving (...) the (...) the (...) sustain (...) Well, if you could surround the planet (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
John, if this is true, I definitely do NOT want you as President when you hit your 50s - you already spout such narrow-minded ideas here, I'd hate to see you get even more conservative. (Luckily I know that in person you seem to be a completely (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
Hm, I was going to post something to John on this subthread, but Bruce pretty much summed up everything I was getting ready to type. Nicely said, Bruce. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I think the 1st Ammendment was broken
|
|
(...) Yup. And one which only time will tell. It was done in Nazi Germany and imperialist Japan; it can be done again today. JOHN (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think the 1st Ammendment was broken
|
|
(...) Consequences? We've hardly seen the final outcome! Maybe regime change in the U.S. will bring our young men and women home. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think the 1st Ammendment was broken
|
|
(...) That's a huge assertion John - as we've hardly even begun to see all the consequences yet. ROSCO (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) Totally agree with you Bruce, Riordan didn't excite a single conservative, but he would have run a much better campaign. Simon ran against one of the weakest candidates ever, and he was horrible. I don't think he is personally stupid, just a (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) lol what I meant was that his question was completely specious to the topic:-) (...) I don't like statistics based on race because I think that they generalize in a way that is unhealthy. We are all Americans. What purpose is there to (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
