 | | Re: Tim Robbins "Countering a Wave of Hate"
|
|
(...) Er, no you don't... You merely know that I chose not to make that particular finding clear one way or another. :-) (any flattery I may have uttered at the time notwithstanding) (URL) to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Tim Robbins "Countering a Wave of Hate"
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello writes: <snip> (...) I'd like to be there for that competition! Dave K (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Tim Robbins "Countering a Wave of Hate"
|
|
(...) I was yesterday reminded of the case of John Rocker. For those of you that aren't familiar with Rocker's situation, he was a star closing pitcher for the Atlanta Braves, very popular and highly regarded with the organization. In a Sports (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For Sean...
|
|
(...) Again, if I were a hockey fan I might know fer sure who was still innit. I grew up in a sea of hockey fans so all my info is thru them. I think the Sens are still in and I know the Canucks are. So Vancouver or Ottawa--two teams i don't have (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Given the right conditions (and we are talking about an incomprehensibly high number of planets with varying conditions), it may well be that the odds against life happening somewhere are the longshots. Atoms and molecules like to form certain (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) Puerto Rico occasionally holds referendums to decide whether to remain a territory (technically a commonwealth) or become a state. I found this on the web as an example: (URL) fairly sure PR would benefit greatly from becoming a state. In the (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: Whoops! That's the one I meant to delete. Dave! (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For Sean...
|
|
(...) The Wild won!!!...!!! (...) Game 7! How could they do this period????? (...) Lessee, who is next for my Wild (Man I hate team names that aren't plurals:-/)... the Canucks! >;^D (...) Wanna make a friendly US-Canadian wager? :-) JOHN (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) Sure the free states were more free, if you were a white male (and a landowner, IIRC). But in terms of personally restrictive laws, I suppose you're correct. Dave! (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) Sure the free states were more free, if you were a white male (and a landowner, IIRC). But in terms of restrictive laws, I suppose you're correct. Dave! (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Sorry to be a buttinski here, but I just thought of something. What about the odds angle? Sometimes coincidences are too great; that is, that the odds of something happening a certain way are way beyond normal expectation. Say, for instance, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) Less democratic, yes. Less free (at least in the free states anyway)? Arguable. (Free society == democratic society) == false (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) True, but the US was hardly even partly democratic at the time (except on paper)! Dave! (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) Whoops! I meant "nope" as in "nope, you're not misremembering", sorry about that. Texans talk about separatism more often than most, for sure. (...) More like 51st through 64th or whatever, one state for each province/territory I would (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Jefferson Muzzle Fix!
|
|
(...) I concur--very nifty site! This past weekend I was visiting the SO in T.O., and was reading these Muzzles out loud to her and her roomies--her artistic roomie was very interested in the 'censoring nude art' and we had a great talk about what (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) K, my misremembery--I thought I read somewhere about a decade ago that there were some Texans talking about forming a 'separatist' movement... (...) That is, until, as some Canadians talk about, Canada becomes the 51st state. Is Puerto Rico (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Jefferson Muzzle Fix!
|
|
(...) Um, did you say something? I can't pay attention to all you Daves! (seriously, nifty site) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) Nope. They're the only (?? (1) ) state that joined by treaty after being an independent republic rather than being an original founder (that ratified the constitution as the means of joining) or a state formed from unorganised territory that (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: La belle province
|
|
(...) Not sure what you mean by immune in this context. Some democratic nations have resisted mightily. The US Civil War was at least partly about separatism. Other democratic nations have not resisted (Czechoslovakia seems to have peacefully (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Jefferson Muzzle Fix!
|
|
(...) Ahh, found it-- (URL) Dave! thought no one listened to him... :) Dave K (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
