Subject:
|
Re: La belle province
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:37:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3140 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > > I noticed the examples you gave were from nations where democracy was
> > > inexistent at the time of the breakup. So I ask: is a democratic nation
> > > immune to separatism?
> >
> > Not sure what you mean by immune in this context. Some democratic nations
> > have resisted mightily. The US Civil War was at least partly about
> > separatism.
>
> True, but the US was hardly even partly democratic at the time (except on
> paper)!
Less democratic, yes. Less free (at least in the free states anyway)? Arguable.
(Free society == democratic society) == false
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: La belle province
|
| (...) Sure the free states were more free, if you were a white male (and a landowner, IIRC). But in terms of restrictive laws, I suppose you're correct. Dave! (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: La belle province
|
| (...) Sure the free states were more free, if you were a white male (and a landowner, IIRC). But in terms of personally restrictive laws, I suppose you're correct. Dave! (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
