 | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) Why is going to church a legal issue? That's about doing what your parents make you do (Yes, I know about emancipation age and so forth). (...) Glad to see you agree here with having a reason to eschew church. And most people we're talking (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) Hey, he has his opinions and I have my own. If he can encompass discussions of world politics with the words "little things," I think I am allowed to express an opinion on that comment. As has been commented before: don't like what you read in (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) There, you've explained how the safety valve works :-) (...) Fun, and instructing. I've learned much from the care many of the debaters put on their research of the topics under discussion - many things of which I'd never even think about, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) Actually Richard, that was a damned assumptive remark. Like some at .debate argue about everything from politics to lego to religion, there are those out there that would rather argue about affairs revolving around sports, cars and movies. So (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) Good points. I post on off-topic.debate irregularly, but view it often. If o-t.debate wasn't there it wouldn't worry me. However, like driving past a traffic accident, I try to ignore it - but I am constantly drawn back. The views expressed (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
relative OTD newbie jumps in. Website: None yet, I gotta get me one of those Residence: Ontario, Southern California. Political: libertarian with a lower case L, because I don’t agree with all their views, but pro-capitalism, anti-big government, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
|
|
(...) <snipped the adultery bit> (...) Determined by a judicial process... so once again, you need a judiciary... and because your theoretical system is dynamic, values for transgressions need to be determined each and every time, so it's going to (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) Indeed. (...) You see my problem is that science has yet to answer 'Why' anything happens. There are lots of good theories on how things happen but not one single answer as to why. It is my observation that people believe by analyzing things (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) Actually, 14. : ) And you say _I_ have inverted priorities? I mean, I'd so much rather uselessly run my mouth about something I'll make sense in rather than something political and making a fool of myself... Or have I done that already? (...) (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) "Little things"? "Sport debates"? Talk about inverted priorities...what are you, 12? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) How is this a safety valve may i ask? (...) True, but wouldn't debating thru emails work better? (...) True, but it be good to see something lego wise from them. (...) Yep, dats basically it. (...) Cool. (...) I care....because i care. (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The U.S. Economy: The Thousand Yard Stare Through the Years
|
|
Wake up, Sunshine! You are not part of the wealthy elite and you probably never will be a member of any U.S. elite class. And yes, I posted this here because YOU do not "get it." And yes, when "they can't see their soul[s] in the mirror," they (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The existance of god... MacHall style
|
|
(...) Hehe, funny. Terry (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Guess who's next?
|
|
(...) Maybe they thought that's where the chemical weapons were hidden? ;-) Terry (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The existance of god... MacHall style
|
|
(URL) (Monday - April 21, 2003) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: off-topic.debate roll call
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Wow! you did the ++Lar right out of the gate! And I agree with your stance on the on-topicness of the question. Nice consistency over the years, Larry! Dave K (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Welcome Worn Out
|
|
(...) My parents always had respect for my wishes & rights. Scott A (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Guess who's next?
|
|
(...) ...while troops were busy toppling statutes for the benefit of the world's media. Scott A (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | off-topic.debate roll call
|
|
Sure, why not.. website: (URL) (commercial... buy something!) (URL) (slushpile of poorly organized stuff) Residence: Ada, Michigan, USA, but can be found practically anywhere in the US (don't seem to travel overseas as much post 911) at any given (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: WMD, again...
|
|
(...) I salute you, sir, for managing to (properly) end your Schuler-referential sentence with Dave! Well done! There's hope for you yet. ++Lar (Lar:communist :: John Neal:competent/willing 6 wide train builder) (I'm KIDDING!) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
