 | | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Basically, I don't care. Still their problem and not mine. I would suggest that they have nothing to live for and might as well risk revolution. I suppose you're going to tell me we should send american boys over there to fight and die for (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) So countries "deliver" "Quality of life" "to their citizens" - very libertarian! ;) Scott A (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: !
|
|
Toast: He'll be burning French books next. (...) Shame on them. Scott A (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What to do with the oil, post war
|
|
(...) You also have the problem that whoever gets to administer the fund instantly becomes a target for the terrorist organisations who have been left out in the cold. But the best proposal I've seen yet. ROSCO (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Perhaps RM erred in such a large snip, but I immediately took his comment to refer to: (...) which seems to be investigating the potential of a country to deliver [quality of life] to it's citizens, as a metric for superiority. No doubt I'll (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) What if the population is being so wickedly repressed (speak out against me and I'll kill your *entire* family in front of you) that they are afraid to resist? (...) You missed my reference. A man asks Jesus what he must do to inherit eternal (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | What to do with the oil, post war
|
|
In my view this is a more well thought out proposal than just about any I've seen: (URL) not laying any odds it will actually happen this way. My suspicion is that the UN bloatocrats will get their fingers on most of the revenues instead. (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
Colonial America and the French during WW II were both actively resisting their oppressors. I don's see this in modern day Iraq. Plus, our entrance into WW II was prompted by the agressive acts of two aggressor nations: Germany and Japan. Japan (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Did we deal with that problem *alone*? (...) Good question. At least the *opportunity* can be given. Why storm the beaches at Normandy in WWII? (...) "Who is my neighbor?" JOHN (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) I believe Richard's straw term is the actual equivocation here (particularily when he snips the entire post to which he is responding). Further, Larry never used this word in the first place; is not even synonymous with his intended meaning. (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Fine. Their problem to deal with, just as King George was ours. Why should freedom be free for them? Why should freedom be bestowed as a gift rather than taken by revolution? CAN it be bestowed as a gift? Me? I mind my own business. -- (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Forgive me if I stick my nose in for a point of clarification. John, your equivocation (or misprision, if you prefer) hinges on two distinct definitions of potential. In terms of physics, a system has potential energy bound up in the nature of (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
(...) attacked (...) registered (...) be (...) Oh trust me, if I could find a link I would post it. It was in the local paper about 2 or 3 years ago. I can not claim to remember everything and if you want to analyze it I don't blame you one bit. I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: (of US vs North Korea) (...) A discussion of quantitative measures of international superiority... this is something I have to participate in! (...) 'More often'? Can you expect to compare morality (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Now might be a good time for you to step back and see where your arguing is taking you, because you have wittingly or no become a useful idiot for some of the most violent and repressive dictators and their regimes the earth has known. JOHN (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | This is odd..."pacifism" takes on a whole new meaning
|
|
Not sure this link will work..im a member of nytimes.com post here if ya cant get to it... To business. It seems that even peace protesters sometimes get frustrated. It seems they sometimes realize violence is the best way to get things done. the (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Parental Responsibilites (was: Megan's Law, and its implications)
|
|
So, have we debated out this topic? I'm getting sick of the pointless debate going on now... Frank (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) You're dodging. You say you reject the notion of moral relativism, right? I'm not talking about EQ characters or size. I'm talking about the metrics we already discussed... morally: which one is on the side of right more often? In which (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) And yet you deleted all the stuff where I disprove this question--it's one of your very own straw men. How can you ask, "Is this superior to that" without qualifications? Canada's geographically bigger than the USA therefore we're superior. Is (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
|
|
(...) Left in because I'm still hoping for a yes/no answer. Just a "yes" or "no" without any qualification or equivocation. (...) Why? If we postulate a yes to the question above, then why should the DPRK be on "on an even playfield with any other (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
